User talk:Returnoftheman

Welcome!

Hello, Returnoftheman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --WikiCats 07:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ebbinghaus

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 23:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The user in question should have been blocked ages ago - he breaches all Wikipedia etiquette, removes whole pages which go against his politics, removes templates and talk page contributions. He is like a very rich, powerful kid running riot and completely discrediting Wikipedia in the process. Returnoftheman 23:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Returnoftheman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been undermined by a number of administrators whose offences are worse than mine/punishment without trial

Decline reason:

Your block is very justified.--Konstable 10:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to deciding admin: User is creating sockpuppet accounts to circumvent blocks. Daniel .Bryant 10:48, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

'Sockpuppetry,' as you so charmingly choose to call it, is better than all the libellous, defamatory, POV editing, administration and arbitration it set out to resist. You don't tolerate 'sockpuppetry,' maybe, but I won't tolerate illegal defamation and libel by Wikipedia, either. Returnoftheman 23:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]