User talk:Retro arcade

February 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Jonathan Thompson, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The issue I have is the person is noteworthy

It’s clear that this article should never have been just simply nominated for deletion just like that it’s also expired the 7 day and it’s clear the consensus is keep

Thing about it logically take a look at the article yourself it’s got clear citations and clear editors have been made supporting the “keep” aspect it should remain please support the debate yourself and choose keep because GORD clear this person is noteworthy based on the links provided and the citations

Retro arcade (talk) 17:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The orginal Warwick Davis photo

Also this needs to be put back as the person owns the copyright it’s clear it’s on his own website as are all the famous people he’s been involved with including himself

The chap is clearly noteworthy in his field also check of the alumni of famous students from Salford university he’s there and in the list of old Mancunians help me save the article in a corroborative afford please as you clearly have more experience at this that I much appreciated if you can thanks Retro arcade (talk) 17:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove other people's comments from talk pages. SmartSE (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me ? I have make my points very clear STOP trying to delete this article without reading it properly the edits have been made and the links are now very clear read my comments before jumping to conclusions

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Retro arcade. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 11:24, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no connection to the individual

The page has been on wiki for years I noticed edits were being made on the profile that were unjust therefore I made alterations the same way you seemed to feel you could Yourself the profile is clearly been re edited and the citations are fine therefore the article should not be deleted

There are no conflicts of interest I just don’t like to see incorrect edits you as a seasoned editor should know better ! Retro arcade (talk) 20:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Employer

I have no connection to the article and or persons and receive no payments please also be aware there are however companies that claim to be wiki writers so by the same token I would expect wiki to stop those individuals too don’t practice what you preach yourself ! End of story Retro arcade (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Talk:Jonathan Thompson, you may be blocked from editing. WP:ARCHIVENOTDELETE (and then, only when the page is too large) Dorsetonian (talk) 20:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]