User talk:Reto.KenSolo

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heroes & Generals. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 11:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Avs5221. Thank you for reviewing my article. I'm working for Reto-Moto, the company developing Heroes & Generals and wish to place relevant and neutral information on Wikipedia about our game, but we haven't gone wide publically and send out press releases yet, so it's difficult for us to find more sources besides our own community site and one interview which we made some moths ago. At the same time we wish for people to be able to find information about our game on Wikipedia when we go public. So is there anything we can do? Reto.KenSolo (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not getting back to you quicker. As I mentioned on the article page, the article verges on something Wikipedia calls the crystal ball. That is to say, it's an article based on an product that has yet to be released. But furthermore, it lacks a great deal of information. It's one thing to write an article about a new car when you're getting constant press releases from the manufacturer, previews from Car and Driver, test drives by journalists, and so on. Because all of that information can be collated and together can sustain an article.

Your article has two sources, neither of which can really delve into the game's content simply because it is yet to exist. If you can, try and expand on the article as much as possible, especially through the use of more sources. As I see it, right now it fails this criteria taken directly from WP:NOT (emphasis added): "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred'.'" Please let me know if you need further help or additional advice to improve your article.

avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 02:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Heroes & Generals. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mangoe (talk) 18:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Heroes & Generals, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (talk) 04:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]