User talk:Resolver-Aphelion

Welcome!

Hello, Resolver-Aphelion! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Danger (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Catholic Church

Per WP:BRD, you need to build consensus on the talk page that the additions to the lead you are seeking to make are necessary rather than just keep reinserting them without discussion which will only lead to them being deleted. An edit summary stating that the reason for them is 'evident' isn't good enough. Haldraper (talk) 11:07, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christian

Hi Resolver-Aphelion,

I just wanted to clarify that I did not intend to identify your edit as vandalism; something went funky with the Javascript I'm using and it chose to ignore my edit description and impose its own. I apologize for that; your edit was not in any way vandalism and I have posted another edit summary explaining that. Feel free to contact me if any trouble should in any way arise from this; again, please accept my apology. Thank you,

-- Joren (talk) 09:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^{P.S. For the record, my originally intended edit description was: This source can and should be removed. However, in the meantime we should not modify a direct quotation (aka we can't put words in other peoples' mouths). Also, please review meaning of "or" :) - Anyway, it's irrelevant now; I went ahead and removed that source because we've been talking about removing it for a while due to reliability concerns and no one has the guts to step up and do it :)}

Catholic Church (May 2011)

Per WP:BRD, you need to establish consensus prior to moving the "Communion of Churches" segment of the article. I reverted your first move on the basis that we had an agreed upon position (see Talk:Catholic Church#Eastern Catholic Churches in lead) for that segment. Since you obviously disagreed with its position, it would have been appropriate at that point to discuss it on the talk page, rather than moving it again on the basis that you felt it was more appropriate where you wanted it. I have initiated a discussion requesting consensus for placement of the segment at Talk:Catholic Church#Placement of section. I invite you to weigh in there on why you feel it is more appropriate for it to be where you have placed it rather than making the unilateral decision to move it. Thanks. Cjmclark ^(Contact) 13:58, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]