User talk:Reptilian2

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Reptilian2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Use of Copyrighted material

Your addition to Noctem has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 16:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Noctem, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ttonyb (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reptilian2 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. ttonyb (talk) 23:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

It is against Wikipedia policy to hold use multiple accounts. If you continue this behavior, you may be blocked. Please only edit with this account. Regards, NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 19:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Noctem, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. What is it you do not understand about using copyrighted material in Wikipedia? How can I help you understand using it is a violation of Wikipedia guidelines and international copyright laws? ttonyb (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Noctem

I have nominated Noctem, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctem. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TN X Man 15:19, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for repeatedly adding material to an article in breach of copyright, despite being warned. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:23, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noctem

A tag has been placed on Noctem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of God Among Slaves

The article God Among Slaves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jimmy Pitt talk 17:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Divinity Noctem

A tag has been placed on Divinity Noctem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. De728631 (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Noctem, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continued addition of copyrighted material to Wikipedia. ttonyb (talk) 17:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of God Among Slaves

A tag has been placed on God Among Slaves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Favonian (talk) 17:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

I'm sorry, I've had to indefinitely block this account, because you just resumed the same behavior that led to a previous 1 week block. That's not how things work around here. Please review the policies linked in the many messages you've been given above, and when it appears you understand the problem and won't repeat it, I'll be happy to unblock you. Ask if you have any questions. --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]