User talk:Reopenmyschool

Please add Sankaralinganar, M.P.Sivagnanam to the list of notable Nadars — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.arun kannan (talk • contribs) 18:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Reopenmyschool, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to IPod Classic seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 17:31, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samsung Galaxy Note 20. Drmies (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, It's a Small World, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:52, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Disneyland, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 16:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. Your recent edit(s) to the page Rock 'n' Roller Coaster Starring Aerosmith appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rock 'n' Roller Coaster Starring Aerosmith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Busy Beavers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited -land, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adventureland.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gambling in Nevada for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gambling in Nevada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambling in Nevada until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

nearlyevil 665 19:22, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Islam in Tunisia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Laplorfill (talk) 02:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Islam in Mauritania. Laplorfill (talk) 02:26, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited -abad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aliabad.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NOTBROKEN

You're making a lot of unnecessary changes to redirect. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, we consider such changes disruptive. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:05, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sinhalisation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sinhala.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Curse of the ninth. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs) 13:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reopenmyschool, I'll add that the wikilinking you keep trying to add violates WP:EGG and the principle of least astonishment. A user clicking on a the name "Beethoven", "Dvořák" or "Schubert" should be taken to an article on Beethoven, Dvořák or Schubert; not to particular symphonies written by them. TJRC (talk) 21:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Narmeen Choudhury" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Narmeen Choudhury. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 9#Narmeen Choudhury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did u add fake details about nadar?

This content was fully rubbish and fake Aneesh sreemangalam (talk) 16:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please start using edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Egsan Bacon (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing links

Please stop editing the links on articles on the various key signatures. In several cases, you're replacing links to specific composers with links to disambiguation pages which lead to other people with the same last name, and in other cases to redirect pages which lead straight back to the same article, which is useless. This is not helpful, nor is the fact (already called to your attention) that you're not using edit summaries to explain your actions as you go. --Finngall ^talk 18:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indic script

- Please do not add any Indic script, to the lead or infobox of any of our India related articles, as you did at West Bengal and other articles, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Baby Wordsworth" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Baby Wordsworth and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 19#Baby Wordsworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please improve your edit summary use

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Your current edit summary level is a pretty modest 7%; that leaves plenty of room for improvement, and I know you can do better! Feel free to contact me on my Talk page if you have any questions. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:37, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pacific Surfliner. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Theodore (name)

added links pointing to Dieudonné, Théodore, Bohdan and Tawadros

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing links

Please stop "fixing" links that are not broken, per WP:NOTBROKEN. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:18, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bengali–Assamese script

Please do not make unexplained edits, like this. Chaipau (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Los Angeles Metro Bus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Segundo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oakland Coliseum station. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:50, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 92309

Hello, Reopenmyschool

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Викидим and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect 92309, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 30 § 92309.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Викидим}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Викидим (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Glasgow Seltic" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Glasgow Seltic has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 3 § Glasgow Seltic until a consensus is reached. Lithopsian (talk) 19:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]