User talk:ReneAjax

February 2017

Hello, I'm Wario-Man. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Zoroaster seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open a new section on Talk:Zoroaster and discuss your concerns there. For your information, those are sourced texts and you can't manipulate them. Current revision is accepted by other editors. You can only change them when they do not match with their cited sources. Provide your sources and add them to article. --Wario-Man (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Noted. -- 09:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours to the page Ibn al-Haytham‎ has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:14, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doug, thank you for notifying me. The edit was made from this account, but it wasn't made by me. I'll be taking extra precautions to ensure this won't happen again.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vasak of Syunik. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 09:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Battle of Nahavand.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Also at Battle of Ctesiphon (363). - LouisAragon (talk) 09:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UserBox

One of your userbox's is up for discussion at the ANI board feel free to respond. Ҝ Ø Ƽ Ħ 12:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!