Jump to content

User talk:Renaati

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A belated welcome!

[edit]
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Renaati! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

[edit]

Hi Renaati,

You have recently been editing Eastern Europe or the Balkans which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please note that you are currently prohibited from editing about the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. This is because you have not yet made 500 edits to the English Wikipedia.

The restriction is "broadly construed", which means that if you are unsure if an edit is affected by the restriction, it probably is. Details about the decision can be found at the "Amendment (September 2021)" section of the arbitration case about antisemitism in Poland; details about the restriction can be found at the "Extended confirmed restriction" section of the committee's procedures.

I have removed your statement from the current case request as the restriction applies to internal discussions including arbitration cases.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for letting me know.
I think it would be helpful if the restriction was clearly indicated on the case request page (i.e. at the top). I was not aware of it myself and you can probably expect to see more people running into it, given how high-profile this case is.
I hope you'll still keep in mind the things I mentioned in the removed message as I believe they're valid and important regardless of how many edits I have. I'm personally suspicious that the person who brought it up did so as exactly the kind of "divide-and-conquer on technicalities" behaviour I was talking about. I have some experience with this sort of actor, and they will do everything they can to weaponise procedural quirks in their favour and cut up the case into smaller pieces that can be buried in rules lawyering, obscuring the larger picture of what they're doing.
Wikipedia's consensus-ruled model is highly vulnerable to this type of exploitation, and if this case goes sideways, it will absolutely be used by the editors concerned to say they have consensus on their side - that is, in favour of nationalist historical revisionism, and Holocaust misinformation, on Wikipedia. I hope that doesn't happen. Renaati (talk) 21:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep the suggestion in mind; perhaps it becomes a common issue and a note at the top of the page may actually be added. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]