Jump to content

User talk:Removeor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Removeor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Pavel Vozenilek 22:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd removed the {{prod}} for technical reasons - prod is intended only for articles and user pages. You may nominate the picture to WP:IFD (images for delete) or create a new map and overwrite the existing one (source for the new map could be mentioned on the page with image). Thanks for understanding. Pavel Vozenilek 22:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to White people. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lukas19 20:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to page 19 of this: [1] You'll see that all Europeans have lighter skin than any Asian. So light skin clause already invalidates Asians from being white. They have only relatively light skin. "Especially of European ancestry" means just that. The exceptions cant be too "out there" like Kim Jong Il. Dictionary.com is a joke, add your additions when you have a reliable source. Lukas19 20:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Again, "Northern orientals" are not white. They are intermediate between Europeans and Africans. If you know Italians who arent light skinned, maybe they arent fully Italian? Maybe they have mixed ancestry? Or maybe they have a tan? You never know. Instead of such anectodal observations, look at the scientific data. So inclusion of "caucasoid" is redundant to me, but add it when you have a better source than dictionary.com Lukas19 20:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why kim jong Il pictures?

[edit]

Why did you put on a picture of Kim jon Il as a "white person" in that article??? i dont think one of the worlds worst dictators is appropriate to have as a frontfigure of this race.. i dont like the article at all but that picture just makes it worse.

--Matrix17 20:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wanna comment on this...Lukas19 23:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]