User talk:Remilyfan

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Rebecca Shaw, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — TAnthony^Talk 10:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you seem to have inadvertently uploaded an image to Wikimedia Commons (File:RebeccaShawPhoto.png/Description at Commons) for which you do not own the copyright. I have taged it for deletion, and uploaded File:RebeccaShaw-NataliaLivingston.png as a fair use replacement; please take note of the information there for use in any future uploads. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 10:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:RobinScorpio.png

Thanks for uploading File:RobinScorpio.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Hi, thanks for your recent contributions to various soap opera articles here. I'm especially appreciative of your including references to Soaps.com when adding plot information (as you have done in Rebecca Shaw, which is so important! However, I would ask you to check out WP:PLOT, Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) to become more familiar with policies regarding fictional topics. Not only should articles consist of more than plot summary, but storyline info itself should be as brief and concise as possible. In the case of Rebecca Shaw, you seem to summarize the plot on an almost day-to-day basis, including relatively minor details. The plot sections of fictional character articles are intended to establish the notability of the characters and provide understanding, not relate every step of every plot in which they have been involved. For example, in your most recent edits you note that Rebecca sees Lucky on the docks and Lucky thinks Liz and Nikolas are talking about him; this is not noteworthy information. Try to think of it this way: if you were to read this article a year from now when these characters are involved in other storylines, what would still seem notable and relevant? So far her entire storyline can really be condensed to something like: "Rebecca comes to town and everyone is shocked at her resemblance to Emily; her growing closeness to both Nikolas and Lucky causes conflict between the brothers, made worse by rising suspicions that she is somehow part of Helena's latest plot to manipulate Nikolas." — TAnthony^Talk 01:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]