User talk:RememberCharlie

Don't ever forget Charlie Morecraft.

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Car model. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, by your other edits, I figured it was just an honest mistake on your part. Cmr08 (talk) 03:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vicki Butler-Henderson, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 05:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bare URLs

Please avoid adding bare URLs as citations per WP:BURL. The use of citation templates makes the references easier to understand.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:01, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP reverting edits

Hi there, I just read the message you left on my talk page about an IP reverting your edits. It looks like most of the edits were putting back fact tags that you removed without providing a source, so I must ask, did you remove the fact tags without providing sources? If you did, then you should already know why the edits were reverted, as I have twice placed a warning here for that reason. Cmr08 (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Resist the impulse to make substantial edits at articles that do not include citations to accompany your edits, even if you are an expert in the area.

Particular articles are plagued by content additions without verifiability (in violation of WP:VERIFY, and approaching if not achieving violation of WP:COPY and WP:OR), to the point that all or nearly all of the text of the article is unverifiable.

Even if you are en expert, the next editor arriving—to follow the pattern set, of content addition without attribution or verifiability—will likely lack your expertise, and your intellectual integrity (with regard to no making changes without expertise). If such patterns are allowed to develop, the value of the article, and eventually, the encyclopedia, diminishes, and their futures are at risk. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 00:32, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]