User talk:Relax630

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Sprintair has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Earlypsychosis (talk) 11:26, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sprintair

A tag has been placed on Sprintair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 1350.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 1350.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warsaw Chopin Airport

The article needs sources IN the article. Claims in the edit-summary are not sufficient. The Banner talk 23:29, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

do you know what GDS is? why do you trust more to some press releases from amateur webpages not confirmed even by the airlines themselves, rather then airline's own inventory and schedule? why are you so narrowminded and not flexible in types of data you might receive? I really want to IMPROVE the quality of wikipedia, and I AM the independent source as industry professional, why do you see it as a downturn? brgs Pawel from WAW Relax630 (talk) 11:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what shall I do for you to trust me and accept my input? I really know what I'm doing Relax630 (talk) 11:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:V: sources must be verifiable. Inside information is not good enough. The Banner talk 16:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat: The article needs sources IN the article. Claims in the edit-summary are not sufficient. The Banner talk 11:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I assume you just refuse to give working independent sources? The Banner talk 16:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]