User talk:Relativeinlaw
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Relativeinlaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:08, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]Your recent editing history at Tribe of Issachar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Of course, I'm aware that we've both reverted more than once here, so I'm not saying this as though I weren't involved. However, when someone attempts to end a cycle of reverts by using the talk page, you should try to join the discussion on the talk page rather than simply continuing to revert.Alephb (talk) 02:28, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Re: "edit war"
[edit]Together with the disputed "scholarly consensus," the bulk of the Issachar Tribe article is gone by now thanks to a 5-second effort of yet another wiki warrior, and the original defender remains silent. A remarkable finale indeed. Relativeinlaw (talk) 22:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)