User talk:RejsHajredini95

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Rejs12345 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

April 2020

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Xherdan Shaqiri, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

In addition, please read the documentation of any template or infobox before adding new parameters to insure that the parameter exists and that you are using it correctly; see Template:Infobox zodiac. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL WARNING The next time you misuse templates in defiance of the template documentation, as you did at Zodiac, your actions will be brought to the attention of administrators for appropriate action, which may include blocking you from Wikipedia. You were warned about this in this edit to Talk:Zodiac. Jc3s5h (talk) 14:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made changes which are true. Please don't block me for nothing. RejsHajredini95 (talk) 14:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you read the English Wikipedia verifiability policy and do you agree to follow it? Jc3s5h (talk) 14:58, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes to Zodiac article - table of dates section as I got the material from: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sidereal_and_tropical_astrology which has more accurate information than the page I edited. Also the dates for IAU boundaries doesn't appear on the edit page. Please understand me and don't make me pressure to be blocked as I am editing what is correct. RejsHajredini95 (talk) 16:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat: Have you read the English Wikipedia verifiability policy and do you agree to follow it?. If you are not willing to follow this policy, I am not willing to assist you. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect you have created the account User:IzmirRexha to use as a sockpuppet and accomplish your incorrect edits. You may try to defend yourself at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RejsHajredini95. Jc3s5h (talk) 12:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RejsHajredini95, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RejsHajredini95! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kia Motors. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:44, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 Albanian parliamentary election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2021 Albanian parliamentary election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheImaCow (talk) 15:52, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blerim Muharremi

The article Blerim Muharremi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 08:03, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete the article as it is about a singer-songwriter which the material is available on Albanian Wikipedia and also has sources on different websites. RejsHajredini95 (talk) 08:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blerim Muharremi

Hello RejsHajredini95,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blerim Muharremi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete the article as it is about a singer-songwriter which the material is available on Albanian Wikipedia and also has sources on different websites. RejsHajredini95 (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blerim Muharremi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blerim Muharremi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harald Wester

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harald Wester requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Harald+Wester&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 06:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of B52 (energy drink)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on B52 (energy drink), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 07:56, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mercedes-Benz A-Class—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I need to add separate articles for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_A-Class_W168 ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_A-Class_W169 and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_A-Class_W176 like is a separate article for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_A-Class_W177

Please understand me as I am doing this for better information to users and in the main article it should be summarized information about this page. RejsHajredini95 (talk) 08:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sidrit Bejleri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sidrit Bejleri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Sidrit Bejleri.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sidrit Bejleri.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 06:46, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My account was blocked for nothing

Hi dear Wikipedia admins!

My account was blocked and I don't know the reason. Someone thanked me for contributing on an article and now why should I have been blocked? Please unblock me as I need to continue editing Wikipedia.

Thanks RejsHajredini95 (talk) 11:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have created a Wikipedia account almost a month ago and I made some edits with references which were helpful for Wikipedia visitors. Someone thanked me for an article. I had a notification that I was blocked as this account may be a sock puppet of another Wikipedia account, but that's not true. Please review my block and decide what's should be.

Thanks RejsHajredini95 (talk) 11:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 331dot!

I didn't had another Wikipedia account. I made some edits and I was blocked for no reason. Please review my block again and decide to unblock me.

Thanks RejsHajredini95 (talk) 13:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RejsHajredini95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked for nothing. I didn't had another Wikipedia account and I need to continue editing Wikipedia RejsHajredini95 (talk) 10:01, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No one "needs" to edit Wikipedia. What is your reason for your "need"? This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it(though only checkusers have access to that evidence). If you had no other accounts, you will need to provide a plausible explanation as to why the technical evidence suggests otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:15, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RejsHajredini95 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was blocked for nothing. I didn't had another Wikipedia account and I need to continue editing Wikipedia. A Wikipedia admin mentioned me as a sock puppet of another Wikipedia account but it's not an imitation of it. I have been user for a while and I made helpful edits to English Wikipedia. A Wikipedia user thanked me too, for creating and editing a Wikipedia article which was missing on English Wikipedia I created articles with references and edited other articles with accurate information. Please decide what I deserve.

Decline reason:

Despite your claim that you "didn't had another Wikipedia account", this is a transparent lie. While your original account is blocked, you are not welcome here. You are now one step closer to a ban under WP:3X. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 13:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RejsHajredini95, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Amkgp 💬 19:20, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keisha Morris for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keisha Morris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keisha Morris until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2021 Albanian parliamentary election

Hello, RejsHajredini95. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Albanian parliamentary election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Albanian parliamentary election

Hello, RejsHajredini95. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Albanian parliamentary election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:04, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]