User talk:Rehanisl

Welcome!

Hello, Rehanisl, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Revolution Meaning, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Revolution Meaning

The article Revolution Meaning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teamone Solutions

A tag has been placed on Teamone Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Teamone Solutions, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 18:50, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teamone solutions pakistan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Teamone solutions pakistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion _(talk) 19:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Teamone Solutions constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Rich Farmbrough, 19:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
19:17, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Revolution by Aristotle

I've put a 'unreferenced' tag on because you do not give any references. As a side point, please don't use the square brackets every time a word that has an article comes up. Just the first time will do. If they haven't looked at a link the first time, they sure aren't going to when it comes up again in the last sentence. Good style calls for linking of words that people might have a problem with, but not dates or ones like 'change', which goes to a disambiguation page and would leave the looker-up just as mystified. (I did the same thing on an early article of mine. Someone changed the blue to black for me and left a note. Like this, but I've left the colour change to you, being mean...) Peridon (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking better, thanks. Your reference could do with being a bit more specific - it's a little hard to contact Aristotle these days, and a book title or two would help. Peridon (talk) 20:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again - nice to do business with someone who listens. You'd be amazed how many don't... Peridon (talk) 20:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alipur Frash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alipur Frash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alipur Frash until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SalfEnergy 22:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Revolution by Aristotle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Revolution by Aristotle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution by Aristotle until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. First Light (talk) 00:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]