User talk:Referenced
April 2007
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Rick Edwards, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Coren 16:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices, as you did with Rick Edwards. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Coren 18:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
And the reason why there is a speedy deletion tag on the article is simple: you make no claim of notability in the article. Not every television host or personality is notable enough to deserve their own Wikipedia article. Flesh out the article, adding information on why that person is notable, preferably with reliable sources and the article will not be deleted. Coren 18:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
--Cometstyles 19:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article you created, as you did with Rick Edwards, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Coren 19:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Re-blocked
[edit]I have given you an addition 24-hour block for evading your previous block with the sockpuppet User:Degrade. During a block you may not edit Wikipedia under any username/IP address. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}}
on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.
Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. --Akhilleus (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)