User talk:Reedabplanalpcowan
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2014
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Reed Cowan has been reverted.
Your edit here to Reed Cowan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te6-MPDBkDk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Reedabplanalpcowan, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Reedabplanalpcowan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Reedabplanalpcowan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Since you are the man himself, I just wanted you to read over our COI policy. This doesn't mean you can't edit, just that you need to be very, very careful about editing to avoid any concerns of self-promotion or other typical COI concerns. A good way to potentially avoid COI concerns is to post on the article's talk page to detail any changes that need to be made to the article and/or to raise concerns at pertinent WikiProjects such as WP:JOURNALISM and the like. I'll ask for someone to come and act as an intermediary and as a mentor from the journalism WikiProject. On a side note, I did notice that you removed several categories from the bottom of the page, mostly ones that dealt with the LGBT categories. While I can understand wanting to remove the labeling of your sexuality in the lead of the article and I agree that it should have been removed, the categories are sort of a different matter. Those enable users to find pertinent subject topics a little more easily. For example, if someone wanted to do research or just read up on journalists that happen to fall within the perspective of LBGT terms, that category can help them find more users than if they were to try using just search terms. The same thing goes for categories such as American journalists and the like. I've added just a few LGBT categories to the page, but did not add all of the ones that were on there previously. One's sexuality should not be the primary and initial focus of an article, but we do put LBGT categories on people who are open about their sexuality. Of course I can see the obvious flaw with the categories since we don't have a "Heterosexual journalists" and so on category, but that's sort of something you'd have to broach in one of the main forums on Wikipedia. I'll try to see which area would be the best one to voice concerns on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- I think that Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Noticeboard would probably be the best place to start if you are concerned with any LGBT related category tags on your page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Name change
[edit]I was writing to say that changing the name of the article is possible, but we would need to see where you are referred to this in the news and in professional circles. In other words, if you still use Reed Cowan professionally and this is predominantly or solely what you go by, that is what the main name on the article will be due to WP:COMMONNAME. We can include the legal name in the lead but we will list the common name first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I would recommend using this account to suggest any changes. Due to the amount of personal attacks in the comment field on the article by IPs, I'm requesting page protection and you won't be able to edit with an IP if this request is accepted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)
July 2017
[edit]
If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:
- Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
- Please send an email to info-en
wikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles email is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.
If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).
A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.
You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
- Adding
{{unblock-un|your new username here}}on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page. - At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
- Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.
- Adding
{{unblock|Your reason here}} on your user talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:55, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Reedabplanalpcowan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.