User talk:Redsparta

Welcome!

Hello, Redsparta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 08:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

busy much

you've been on for the past 9 hours editing! H2P 19:31, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

haha, it's been on and off. i was just trying to get the tedious work of adding the cast list to the eppy pages but i never knew it would take so long. i suppose i have too much time on my hands >_> redsparta 20:21, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to delete this message after you read it. I wanted to draw your attention to the talk page of the series main page. I'm discussing adding character pictures to the page and I want to get a green light from you and Proto before doing so. H2P 05:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In 1.5 hours, all our watched sites will explode. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 23:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah... I guess my spelling is horrible. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 07:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean? -Redsparta 07:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing random editing, and each new edit I made you went over and spell checked it usually hitting atleast one word. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 08:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear God, I gotta do all the edits now :-(. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 16:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Michael Dante DiMartino, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove my link to the pick of Ozai's face?Its a picture from a site around Avatar. Its not an uploaded image. And,seing as his face has been the subject of such discussion amongst fans,why THE HECK did you remove it? New Babylon

Earth Kingdom Locations

Honestly I just moved that section there so they'd stop putting it on the Earth Kingdom page and we wouldn't have to war so much. If the whole page gets deleted I'm good with that. H2P ^{(Yell at me for what I've done)} 04:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be fine with me. As I see it, as of now, there's so little information on most of the locations the only worthwile ones are the major cities which are already listed on the Earth Kingdom page. -Redsparta 05:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jin and zuko date-ttobss.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jin and zuko date-ttobss.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The waterbending master-zhao and pirates.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The waterbending master-zhao and pirates.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:The siege of the north part 1 img1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The siege of the north part 1 img1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jet-zuko fight cowas.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jet-zuko fight cowas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Iroh & zuko (bitter work).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Iroh & zuko (bitter work).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Wan_shi_tong.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wan_shi_tong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Iamunknown 22:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:City of walls and secrets img1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:City of walls and secrets img1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Avatar roku (winter solstice pt 2)img1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The chase img2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The chase img2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 10:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The chase img3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:The chase img3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 10:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures

An editor has nominated List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Avatar: The Last Airbender creatures and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notification for Avatar: the Last Airbender

Avatar: The Last Airbender has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Collectonian (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Redsparta! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 313 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Bryan Konietzko - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improving chart at Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction

This article is the most-viewed page for cannabis issues in the US (~1,500 views/day). I think we can streamline it to make it less clunky and more intuitive for readers, especially now that we have state-specific articles for all US states. Your feedback is invited: Talk:Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction#Changes_to_chart.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 19:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Redsparta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Redsparta. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

California High-Speed Rail vital article

Really? Let's add it when/if it opens. Until now I can't see how its significance can be compared to existing HSR systems with significant patronage. I would have added something like Korea Train Express first. feminist (talk) 12:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about that as I was adding it, if it deserves a place on the list considering it’s not due to open for a number of years still, and if we are already looking to cull then there are assuredly others that are currently more deserving of being on there, however I felt it notable as the first HSR in the U.S. (North America, even?). So if push comes to shove I agree it should be removed until/if it opens but I felt that since Vital articles/L5 (Vital articles/L5/Technology also) is still a ways off from being complete (a little over halfway) it could stand to be on there for the time being but if you don’t think it stands up I won’t dissent in its removal. red sparta ••• talk to me 00:33, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think Acela is America's first HSR. feminist (talk) 02:43, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I wasn’t aware of the Acela Express reaching HSR speeds but it’s kind of a technicality as it only seems to operate at HSR speeds of 150 mph on 34 miles of its 457 mile route and it shares its track with much slower commercial and passenger rail. red sparta ••• talk to me 03:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But yes, it's true that the list is far from complete. I was just curious why you picked that article instead of other existing systems. feminist (talk) 02:45, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t necessarily pick it over other systems but more, personally, as a prominent thought it was one that came to mind. I’m still kind of learning of HSR around the world so I wasn’t aware of for example the Korea Train Express. red sparta ••• talk to me 03:37, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Redsparta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apple Maps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrimack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 in video gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Run and gun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:35, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pokémon Black 2 and White 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to NPC and Unova

Pokémon Black and White (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Unova

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 in video gaming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Math Pokemon

I didn't know 251-152=100. It's not. It's 99. You might want to check that. UB Blacephalon (talk) 13:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blacephalon (talk · contribs) Where are you getting 152? There are 151 in gen I. Add 100 and you get 251. redsparta^talk 14:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The passage says Chikarita is number 152. Celebi is number 251. 251-152=99. Done.UB Blacephalon (talk) 14:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blacephalon (talk · contribs) Ok let's do some basic math. Mew is 151=End of gen I. Which means gen II starts at 152(1) 153(2) 154(3) 155(4) 156(5) 157(6) 158(7) 159(8) 160(9) 161(10). Another ten is 171. Add ten more 181, 191, 201, 211, 221, 231, 241, 251. Also, read the very top of the page on Serebii where it says there are 100 Pokémon in this generation. Done. redsparta^talk 14:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. I never thought of it like that...... Thanks! UB Blacephalon (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. redsparta^talk 01:10, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

What was that you told me about a wiki not being a reliable source? Well, I deleted the mention of the super Mario wiki on the page called list of Mario franchise characters and three days later, a vandal called miraclepine readded it and I don't want to get into an edit war. So, can you please tell miraclepine to not do anything when I remove the mention? The Lord of Falafel (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an administrator so I can’t make someone stop doing something but if someone is not acting in WP:GOOD FAITH I would bring it up with someone like Sergecross73. However, it looks like they were adding it to the external links section, and external links isn’t necessarily as strict about what is acceptable as reference sourcing is. According to Links to be considered: "Sites that fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources" is acceptable for external links. redsparta^talk 23:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting.

Thanks for reverting Template:Super Smash Bros. my edits. I wasn't sure if what I was doing was going to be accepted because of the solo page, but I followed WP:BOLD and just did it. Maccore Henni _{Mii! Pictochat Mii!} 18:17, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow, well thank you very much! redsparta^talk 01:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting my edits! Maccore Henni _{Mii! Pictochat Mii!} 18:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Game Boy Advance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DAC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of best-selling Xbox 360 video games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BGR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Botched edit

Hi there, regarding my edit here, you are completely right and what you removed was exactly what I intended to remove for the same reason, but somehow I managed to do the opposite. That IP is the latest of a long-term vandal described here, and they add variations of this stuff to either the infobox, the article proper, or to the categories at the end of the article, e.g "cancelled gamecube releases", etc. Eik Corell (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I actually brought the actions of a user doing similar things up at the WikiProject Video games talk page late last year (see archived discussion) and an IP has been continuing to perform similar edits since; I wouldn’t be surprised if it was the same person. redsparta^talk 04:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PlayStation 5 Sales Citation

Hi. Regarding the reference I included for the PS5 sales, the reference itself had not been duplicated, even though it had been cited twice throughout the PS5 article. As long as a reference includes a named footnote, it can be cited multiple times throughout an article and will still only appear once in the bibliography. Wikipedia actually encourages this practice when citing the same source multiple times. Learn more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes#WP:NAMEDREFS and here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnotes. Because sales of the PlayStation 5 system are going to be a highly discussed issue from this point, it’s probably important to have a citation in the infobox as well as in the main body of text.

Also, just a heads up, apostrophes are not used to represent plurals. So the plural of "PS5" would be "PS5s" and not "PS5's".The Editor 155 (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor 155 (talk · contribs), a single source can be cited multiple times, absolutely. However, if multiple claims are citing the same source, guidelines encourage using the "ref name" template. The full ref tag was being used to cite the same reference multiple times which kind of defeats the purpose of using the "ref name" template: to point to the identical ref already being used elsewhere in the article. And I'm not gonna throw a fit about the cite for sales figures being in the infobox, however WP:INFOBOXREF discourages using references in the infobox if the same information is already cited in the body (which it is, in the Sales section). redsparta^talk 00:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for clarifying. I shortened the infobox citation to only include the "ref name" template.The Editor 155 (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A small token of appreciation.

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Just wanted to express gratitude for your making my first interpersonal editing experience pleasant, informative, and constructive. Thanks again! Fact Scanner (talk) 14:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bad grammar?

What do you mean by bad grammar exactly? I do have a bit of a mental disability, so it kind of feels you are unintentionally insulting me because of my handicap. I am not accusing you of being a bully or anything, I just need some clarification.

It was particularly the three consecutive uses of "however." Your undo appeared to be bad faith reversion of some appropriate copyediting which may have perhaps influenced my wording. Apologies. redsparta^talk 04:48, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Redsparta, i see your a pokemon fan. i have a question

On the pokemon red and blue article, i have made a few changes, i have spoken to a few admins and they say the edits i made was good. wanted to know if your happy with the few edits i made.. i made a few changes regarding pokemon green, basically saying it was the only game that wasn't released outside of Japan, unlike red and blue was, wanted to hear your thoughts on this as you seem to have made a few edits on pokemon aswell, thankyou! EzeeWiki (talk) 02:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's basically re-stating information that is already there earlier in the paragraph. The information being included is fine but it doesn't need to be stated twice. redsparta^talk 03:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Pokemon Sword and Shield

Hey! I noticed that you reverted an IP that removed blank parameters from the infobox. May I ask why you reverted the IP? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 05:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the harm in them being there. They're there if the applicable information becomes/is available to fill in and let's people less familiar with Wikipedia know that it is supported information in the infobox; if they don't get used they aren't really hurting anything by being there. redsparta^talk 02:28, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]