User talk:Redshoesproductions

Welcome!

Hello, Redshoesproductions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Shudde ^talk 02:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ray Gravell

If the interview contains any useful information, then please include it in the article as prose, using the interview video URL as a reference. However, if you have no intention of including anything from the interview in the article, then it really serves no purpose as an external link. In fact, given your username, I'd say it sounds a bit like self-promotion. – Pee Jay 10:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have doubts about whether your edits are in good faith or not. In fact, I'm sure that they are. However, adding content from a source that you are directly involved in presents conflict of interest issues. I hope you understand. – Pee Jay 17:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guidelines

You may want to have a read of WP:EXTERNAL—especially if you want to add external links to more articles. One has to be careful of conflict of interest and such, but I it has encyclopaedic value, and is clearly not advertising, then I wouldn't be concerned about the Ray Gravell link. The above guidelines does state (see Wikipedia:External links#What should be linked), that "Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews", should be linked. So I don't think the link is a problem. - Shudde ^talk 02:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One thing (sorry I seem to be going on), it may be best in the future, that if you have a link you think is valuable (to a site you are associated with), to instead mention it on the article's talk page, and allow a non-involved editor to add it. This will steer you clear of any conflict of interest problems. - Shudde ^talk 02:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wales Video Gallery

The article Wales Video Gallery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable charitable organization that does not appear to have much third-party coverage that is significant at all.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HominidMachinae (talk) 07:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]