User talk:Reds0xfan
|
Thanks for your contributions to Ryan's article - I've been having trouble finding information on his early life and career. If there's any more information you can provide on this, please add it or let me know. I'm keen to have this article be as good as it can be. Cheers. — Estarriol talk 11:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:RyanBennett.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:RyanBennett.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Blocking users
[edit]I wish I could, but I'm not an admin, I'm afraid. the best place to go to to report users who are vandalising is WP:AIV. Hope this helps! Tim (Xevious) 18:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Mysteries of the Bible
[edit]Where is the source that states the air dates of the episodes of Mysteries of the Bible? 'Cause I think some of the air dates that you added to the article are wrong, because at the end of The Bible's Greatest Secrets it says copyright 1995 in the credits (I know this because I have that episode recorded from a December 2001 marathon on A&E), and even though you'd think that that was the first episode, you have the airdate as January 1, 1994.-71.63.45.143 (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I think the episode dates listed are incorrect as well. The link listing the airing dates is the Amazon episode link in the "Links" section at the bottom of the page.
Reds0xfan (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Yoon Hwan Choi
[edit]Thankyou for creating this article.Johnpacklambert (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome! Reds0xfan (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
BoM geography models merge proposal
[edit]Hi. Dunno whether you were aware of the existing Limited geography model article, which already covers much the same ground as the new article on BoM geographical settings you'd recently created. In any case, have proposed a merge action, pls see here for any discussion/comment you may care to add. Cheers, --cjllw ʘ TALK 03:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of The Malay Theory
[edit]
I have nominated The Malay Theory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Malay Theory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Goodraise 07:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Please remember that we have to do more than cite the primary source. We also have to establish that the subject is notable as per WP:NOTABILITY. Right now, there don't seem to be any sources other than the book itself which deal with the subject. On that basis, the article would fail notability requirements, because notability requires, for cases like this, at least two secondary reliable sources which give some significant attention to the idea. The primary source itself does not count toward that number. John Carter (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- so are discussions on these blogging websites listed considered Notable? If not, I guess we can merge the info into the Limited Geography article, but IMO, that article has a host of problems. It seems to me we're just moving the problem from one article to another, but if that's following Wiki policy, then I guess I don't have a major qualm with merging it to the Limited Geography (LGT) article. I just think the LGT is already too huge, and adding this info there will make it even larger. I don't think that merging the info makes LGT better, but worse. Reds0xfan (talk) 17:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- Blogs are not notable, no. Anyone can post anything about anything on a blog. But, like I said, there is a notable if discredited theory about the early settlers of North America which is also called the Malay Theory. References to it can be found here, here, and maybe here. If you were to create an article on the discredited theory, then that article could include material on the newly "updated" version of that old theory which is basically what the existing content is. That might be one way around the problem. John Carter (talk) 17:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Malay theory
[edit]OK, as noted the theory as it stands is nonnotable. However, the other older discredited theory is. There were comments on the AfD discussion to the effect that there were, basically, too many articles with substantive content on this theory. Would it be acceptable to you to, eventually, remove the bulk of the content from the other articles and instead provide a link to the new article on the Malay theories? If yes, I probably could copy out the information and maybe move it to a user subpage for you, something like User:RedsOxfan/Malay theory for instance, to develop the article with content regarding the other theory until the article would be likely to survive another AfD. Would that be acceptable to you? John Carter (talk) 15:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Yes, John, that would be a great help. (And there is a ZERO, not the letter "O" in my username.) Thanks for your help. Reds0xfan (talk) 02:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]There is a proposed merge that I think would interest you at Talk:Limited geography model#Several merge proposals - my take. I am posting this notice because I saw that you were a recent editor at one of the pages listed below:
- Limited geography model
- Proposed Book of Mormon geographical setting
- Archaeology and the Book of Mormon
--Descartes1979 (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Act in Relation to Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apostle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
re:UVU
[edit]I did not see it in the dif button. YE Pacific Hurricane 02:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Quillen
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jim Quillen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —teb728 t c 22:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Reds0xfan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Reds0xfan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Yoon Hwan Choi for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yoon Hwan Choi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoon Hwan Choi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 10:48, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Mervyn B. Arnold for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mervyn B. Arnold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mervyn B. Arnold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 09:27, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Reds0xfan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Gospel Tangents Interview for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gospel Tangents Interview is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gospel Tangents Interview until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Gideon (Book of Mormon) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No secondary sources seem to cover this story character in depth
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)