User talk:Redmagemp3
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JoeSmack Talk 03:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:ChromeDreamsII.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:51PGyD7h+IL. SSa500 .jpg. The copy called Image:51PGyD7h+IL. SSa500 .jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Undoing, rollbacking or reverting should NEVER be done without explanation unless the edit you are undoing is vandalism. Accusing me of vandalism is not going to achieve much. And watch your reverting, remember the three revert rule. J Milburn (talk) 11:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Look at Global rule #4 "The posting of personal information or calls to invasion is prohibited."Redmagemp3 (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- That would be original research. We have sources linking 4chan to the events. Therefore, it stays. J Milburn (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 4chan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Kip Kip 23:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
J Milburn (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 4chan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
dsfargeg
[edit]see Talk:4chan#dsfargeg_vs._random. It's still a random image board. --Have a nice day. Running 15:38, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
"English sources only"
[edit]Hi, responding to this edit summary; we actually allow sources in all languages; English sources are preferred, but having the best source is more important. That said, in this case the French one was mostly a translation of the English source already in use, so it doesn't really matter. More a general note. Happy editing, —Giggy 05:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop removing news sources if the URL does not work. Because a hard copy of the source exists, we can simply remove the URL. DigitalC (talk) 06:34, 18 July 2008 (UTC)