User talk:Redlady1

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Redlady1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --GreenJoe 18:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why births have been removed

I have removed various children from the birth section of this day in history pages, I do not belive they are notable in their own right. Remember entries should consist of information about "notable" subjects. What exactly constitutes notability is the subject of constant debate on Wikipedia, but few of us believe that there should be articles about every person on the planet, every company that sells anything, or each street in every town in the world.

It is nothing personal. --Drappel 00:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Miranda Johanna Maria Rijnsburger

A tag has been placed on Miranda Johanna Maria Rijnsburger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deranged bulbasaur 12:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Date pages

Please note the first item of the hidden-text notification in the "Births" section of these pages:

Do not add people without Wikipedia articles to this list

I have, therefore, removed those listings you added which do not have corresponding articles. Please do not re-add them. --Calton | Talk 05:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hello. I can find no logical explanation for your recent changes to January 13 and January 14 so I have reverted your edits. It appears that the only change was in de-alphabetizing the entries. I am interested in understanding your logic if you feel that the edits were warranted. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 17:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to January 23. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 18:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's centralize this discussion. There is a standing convention that names are alphabetical within the birth and death sections, although it only seems to have been mentioned in Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Years. Please bring up your proposed convention change in Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Days of the Year or another appropriate Wikipedia:WikiProject Time page before making future revisions. And I agree with Mufka. It appeared to be vandalism. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 16:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Mufka

Please do not make your contributions using only capital letters. It is considered shouting and is frowned upon. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you should consider providing an edit summary along with your edits so other editors can understand what you're doing. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 16:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My response is here. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 17:12, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Redlady1! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 311 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Princess Zein bint Al Hussein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Princess Jalilah bint Ali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Prince Abdullah bin Ali - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Princess Zein bint Hussein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Zein bint Hussein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Zein bint Hussein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:50, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]