User talk:Redfieldp

Orphaned non-free image File:PlantsAndAnimalsLaLaLandCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PlantsAndAnimalsLaLaLandCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of New England Time Capsule

The article New England Time Capsule has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable short film, only showed in one theatre, no coverage other than from primary sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 17:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Read Viemeister has been accepted

Read Viemeister, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep (talk) 17:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have improved a bit your article improving structure, content and categories. Please add more references (links proving what is being said). I have also reworked the first references into a better template with the archive version and suggest to use the same template for other references. Good luck with your edits. -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 14:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Cooke

Hi there - thanks for creating the new article Julia Cooke. At the moment there are no sources at all in the article. Every article on Wikipedia needs at least one source, especially as it’s a biography of a living person. Please could you urgently add in sources, otherwise another editor may nominate the page for deletion. Thanks! Cardiffbear88 (talk) 17:43, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julia Cooke

The article Julia Cooke has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 13:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Cooke moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Julia Cooke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Julia Cooke

Hello, Redfieldp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julia Cooke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Julia Cooke

Hello, Redfieldp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Julia Cooke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]