User talk:Redfender98

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Axl Rose has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Axl Rose was changed by Redfender98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912927 on 2018-04-04T04:55:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:55, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Stapp. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RF23 (talk) 05:11, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Axl Rose. RF23 (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What you did on the talk page on the Columbine High School massacre, is simply not done. Richard 08:32, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for vandalism and illegitimately refactoring other users' talk page comments.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 09:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21098 was submitted on Apr 04, 2018 16:21:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}} Redfender98 (talk) 20:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry I was experimenting with editing and didn’t mean to vandalize. I understand what I did was unproductive and I promise if I’m unblocked this won’t happen again.

Decline reason:

Given your edits, you can't claim you "didn't mean to vandalize". You clearly set out to harm Wikipedia and your denial convinces me if unblocked, you would continue to do so. Yamla (talk) 10:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Is somebody gonna reply to me? Redfender98 (talk) 23:33, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-admin comment Please be patient. Everyone who is a part of this project are volunteers, and undoubtedly have their own priorities to attend to. Your unblock request will be reviewed in due time. Meanwhile, it will be helpful to consider what you are going to do here if you are unblocked, and include that information in the unblock request, as well as why your previous edits were not appropriate, as simple platitudes are not enough to convince an administrator to unblock you. Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 04:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

'Experimenting' is not the word I would use to describe your edits and 'didn't mean to' does not sound credible. Still, I am not a resentful person and I do believe in second chances. Richard 06:20, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I am very sorry what I did was wrong because it was offensive like I said It won’t happen again. Can I please be unblocked now!? Redfender98 (talk) 13:24, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holy shit this is bullshit I have expressed sorrow for this and y’all are asking me to beg this is probably the highlight of your career fuck y’all!!! Redfender98 (talk) 13:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and btw y’all are asking for it letting any random person edit! Redfender98 (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is why nobody reads Wikipedia and y’all need donations haha lol loosers!!! Redfender98 (talk) 13:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits between 13:24 and 13:38 show a lack of patience and an ill temper. As Zyc1174 tried to explain before, you should not expect to always get an instant reaction. Your cursing is an excellent method of reducing any goodwill you might have left. In that light, I am pretty certain your new unblock request will be denied as well. Anyway, it is out of my hands. Richard 14:37, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well what good are you doing if it’s out of your hands. Redfender98 (talk) 15:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry about about my past edits that were unproductive and offensive. I promise if this block is lifted I will edit with responsibility and this will not happen again. Thank you and god bless you!

Decline reason:

Asking for it, eh? Any random person edits Wikipedia constructively. It takes a very special person to do as you have done. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very sorry about about my past edits that were unproductive and offensive. I promise if this block is lifted I will edit with responsibility and this will not happen again. Thank you and god bless you!

Decline reason:

And you as well. auf weitersehen, 6 months from now.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Given your comments above these duplicate unblock requests, it's pretty clear to me you are just trolling. As such, I've revoked talk page access. Another admin will review your outstanding unblock request. If they deny it, you are welcome to wait six months and then apply under WP:SO using WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21111 was submitted on Apr 05, 2018 18:07:28. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:07, 5 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21112 was submitted on Apr 05, 2018 19:05:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:05, 5 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Redfender98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21113 was submitted on Apr 05, 2018 19:18:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]