User talk:RedRobinIndependence

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bubble Guppies has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bubble Guppies was changed by RedRobinIndependence (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938646 on 2021-01-03T03:19:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:20, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that in this edit to Bubble Guppies, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bubble Guppies, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:29, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bubble Guppies. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Taumata994 (talk) 03:30, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedRobinIndependence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Stop engaging in an edit war again this time RedRobinIndependence (talk) 03:35, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What constructive edits would you make? I'm not really sure that you're mature enough to edit Wikipedia yet. Read through Help:Getting started and propose an edit that you'd like to make to Wikipedia here on your talk page. It should add encyclopedic content to an article and include a citation to a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RedRobinIndependence (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read through getting started and stop engaging in an edit war this time RedRobinIndependence (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

tpa revoked. Yamla (talk) 18:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Email access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 11:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]