User talk:RedEyeKav

Welcome!

Hello, RedEyeKav, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Tokata Iron Eyes did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tokata Iron Eyes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 11:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The original article is libellous and doesn’t represent tokata, it was written using only her parents now debunked claims of grooming and abuse. It gives no context, only biased and malicious gossip. RedEyeKav (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then provide updated, independent reliable sources that the article can be updated based upon. —C.Fred (talk) 11:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m tryijg if you stop undoing, I.kll add them. But why do we allow people to use tabloid junk claims in these articles? Vanity fair “anonymous sources” about spider goddesses? RedEyeKav (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a matter to be addressed at the talk page, if you feel there is an issue with VF's reporting. —C.Fred (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Tokata Iron Eyes. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —C.Fred (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s because the article was libellous I’m trying to fix it so you don’t get sued. Tokata is not represeted here fairly. If you give me a few minutes to re-edit. RedEyeKav (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Present your new sources at the talk page. Because you have continued to add unsourced material in violation of WP:BLP, you have been blocked from editing the article. —C.Fred (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Tokata Iron Eyes) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 11:54, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I updated with references, but can you explain why in every page referencing Ezra Miller I find unverified and now debunked tabloid gossip and fake allegations over actual facts? Miller and Iron Eyes are verified stating they were never in a relationship, Miller’s rep has also stated it, so how come you never edited that libellous misinformation? RedEyeKav (talk) 11:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, provide the reliable sources so we can update it. I have yet to see a reliable source. —C.Fred (talk) 12:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two people alleging abuse and then being refuted by all parties and losing in court, yet it’s the information used by wikipedia? It’s why people don’t trust this site. I know the people involved, so it’s hard to verify that, but as you also cannot verify a relationship, why is this included in the article? It looks like heavy bias and vendetta. My edits aren’t perfect but they’re better than the abusive libel written before. RedEyeKav (talk) 12:09, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like your conflict of interest is overshadowing your ability to write from neutral point of view regarding either of the Iron Eyeses. —C.Fred (talk) 20:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I have reverted your post on Talk:Tokata Iron Eyes as Wikipedia is not a forum for posting allegations against living persons. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Tokata Iron Eyes and Chase Iron Eyes for a period of 1 month for persistent addition of unsourced material and other violations of WP:BLP, compounded by your WP:COI. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 20:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]