User talk:RedCardinal19

Uncommented revert

Using an edit summary, can you say your reason for a revert. Without this, the action is just tendentious. Dicklyon (talk) 04:34, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the specific issue of capitalization after a slash in an infobox position, you might want to join the conversation I just started at WT:MOSCAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 04:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Hi, I noticed that you have marked all your edits as minor edits. Please note that Wikipedia has a very specific definition of what is considered a WP:MINOR edit, so please follow the links and familiarize yourself with the policy on what should and should not be marked as minor.

Happy editing. Raladic (talk) 17:27, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blake Fisher has been accepted

Blake Fisher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RedCardinal19/2023–24 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RedCardinal19! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team has been accepted

2023–24 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 22:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Jimmygrove per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jimmygrove. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:01, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jayden Thomas

Hello, RedCardinal19

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sadads, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jayden Thomas, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sadads}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sadads (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]