Jump to content

User talk:RecordingIndieGal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To do:

  1. Columbia Records
  2. Rob Stringer
  3. Epic Records
  4. L.A. Reid

RecordingIndieGal, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi RecordingIndieGal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pianeta Design for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pianeta Design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pianeta Design until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

signed, Rosguill talk 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello RecordingIndieGal. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Pianeta Design, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RecordingIndieGal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RecordingIndieGal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. signed, Rosguill talk 19:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote three articles for the magazine once, but I wasn’t paid for them. Does that count? If so I apologize! RecordingIndieGal (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It would count as a conflict of interest, but not as paid editing. I'd recommend that you read through the relevant guideline, WP:COI and make disclosures as necessary. signed, Rosguill talk 19:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! RecordingIndieGal (talk) 20:23, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]