User talk:Record straight&true

April 2011

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Kelson 1, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Taroaldo (talk) 00:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC) They are all sockpuppets of RMHED, believe me I should know.[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 00:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:Trowbridge tim. Record straight&true (talk) 00:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

All the edits I made were correct, not vandalism. Record straight&true (talk) 00:54, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those accounts were identified as socks by checkusers. Reverting them constitutes vandalism. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 01:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they are socks of User:RMHED, User:Trowbridge tim has confirmed the veracity of my edits on his talk page. Record straight&true (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trowbridge tim has been blocked as a vandalism only account, and this is their first time editing in more than a month. Not exactly believable. Regards, MacMed^talk _stalk 01:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trowbridge tim was a sock of User:RMHED, therefore all the socks labelled as tims are really RMHED's. I am user RMHED, so I should bloody know which socks were mine FFS. Record straight&true (talk) 01:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]