User talk:Reccmo

Welcome!

Hi there! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and stick around. If you want, you can drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log to introduce yourself.

A few tips before you start doing a lot of editing:

A few basic rules: Try to write from a neutral point of view, be bold in editing pages, and use Wikiquette.

A handy page for newcomers is the welcome page. The Wikipedia tutorial also gives a lot of basic info that will help get you oriented on Wikipedia. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.

When you post something on a talk/discussion page, you can sign your name by using three tildes (" ~~~ ") for your username and four (" ~~~~ ") for your username and a timestamp.

Remember to provide an edit summary when editing.

If you ever find yourself with nothing to do on Wikipedia, have a look at the Community Portal, you'll find that there's always something happening.

If you have any questions, comments, or just want to say hi, don't hesitate to write to me on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

Happy editing! :-) Akamad ^{Happy new year!} 11:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Werner Icking Music Archive

What is it about the WIMA that all you do is add external links to it into several articles? It would be nice if you write an article about it first. I hope this is not just a way to advertise the site. -- Perfecto 22:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -- Perfecto 22:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have no need for advertising WIMA which is strictly non-commercial, just try a Google search on "Werner Icking Music Archive" to see why. My aim is simply to improve the Wikipedia articles on composers by adding links to freely available, mostly high quality scores by those composers. I'll consider adding an article on WIMA.

Christian Mondrup

PS See my New User log

Reccmo 23:06, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it sufficient with the entry on WIMA I added several weeks ago to the external links section of the Wikipedia article on Sheet music?

Reccmo 23:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly. Wikipedia is not a collection of external links. What you do is seeding Wikipedia articles with external links to a website you maintain, and it's not our exact intention. See Wikipedia:External links.

RE: "freely available". I found it hard also to assess whether your data is free content. You say free now, yet I've seen nothing on the site saying "free forever". In other words, when the site gets bought, and the new owner started charging, she potentially has hundreds of links from Wikipedia in place. -- Perfecto 15:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1. See the article on the Werner Icking Music Archive I entered earlier today. Unless you claim I'm lying that article should present evidence of the public domain nature of WIMA. WIMA can't possibly be bought by anybody because the site is hosted by a Danish state owned cultural organization, The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus.

2. Tell me why external links to music in similar public domain libraries like CPDL and Mutopia that existed before I added links to WIMA are not offensive! I am cooperating closely with the editors of these archives. If you believe I'm lying then ask these editors!

Reccmo 15:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The links I've been adding are all referring to freely available, public domain music by the composers in concern. Take as an example the article on Johann Sebastian Bach. The external link to WIMA is to a web index of music solely by this composer. That's how WIMA is structured.

Reccmo 16:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For a presentation of the WIMA publishing and usage conditions see the introductory page, http://icking-music-archive.org/scores/Introduction.html

Reccmo 16:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As you'll notice from the editing history of the article on Michael Praetorius the author of the inital article (user Camenbert) added an external link to the WIMA Michael Praetorius web index.

Reccmo 17:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you for clarifying this with me. -- Perfecto 18:00, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WIMA

Template:WIMA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine for me to phase out the template WIMA provided references to the non maintained but still existing site WIMA are replaced with references to the corresponding IMSLP pages through the IMSLP template

Reccmo (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Reccmo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mup music publication program

Hello, Reccmo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mup music publication program, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 10:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Reccmo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mup (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 1997kB was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Reccmo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mup (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

References added since last submission don't meet Wikipedia's standard for reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mup, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 07:46, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Reccmo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jennifer I. Paull.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jennifer I. Paull.jpg, which you've attributed to ticket 2018072310008055, which does not contain acceptable evidence of permission. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]