User talk:Rebelprince

This is so that I can move around wikipedia more easier, I created it because no one put on a wikipedia welcome page.

Block Appeals

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rebelprince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well basically all the reasons why I should be unblock are on the top of the page and Like I said I wish to discuss getting unblock by the users who requested that I be blocked. I also read the WP:Duck page and I found something out, the interesting thing is that User:Tylerwade123 always used different accounts to continue his edits even when he got blocked so if I was him I would be doing that to but I haven't so you guys kinda wrongfully blocked me

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified sockpuppet of User:Tylerwade123. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 23:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rebelprince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know that my previous edits were illegal or classified as Vandalism and I will make sure that it won't happen again. All that I can say is that I believe I can improve wikipedia pages, I'm not a meatpuppet but I can't convince you of it, but just give me a chance please.

Decline reason:

No, you can't create other accounts to evade blocks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First of all I haven't created any new accounts It doesn't even say I did, that's not good to say especially when especially when users only think it's possible I did.--Rebelprince (talk) 21:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at User:Tylerwade123 discussion page and he just insulted me what should I do.--Rebelprince (talk) 03:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, since Tylerwade is you, [1] [2] [3] [4] I don't think you have anything to complain about. Edward321 (talk) 06:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not him that's what I've been trying to say all this time, besides if I was him why would I insult myself further more this is more than enough proff that I'm not a meatpuppet so please let me back on.--Rebelprince (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rebelprince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No matter anyone says I have not created a another account nor I'am I a meatpuppet, please give me another chance on wikipedia so I can prove I'm not a vandal, please I will not vandalize.

Decline reason:

Checkuser has confirmed that you are the same user as Tylerwade123. This confirmation is based both on behavioral evidence (the edits you have made at Wikipedia) and technical evidence unavailible to normal admins. Given the checkuser confirmation, there is already positive confirmation of this. If you believe this is in error, your only recourse is to contact a member of the arbitration committee by emailing them as described at WP:ARBCOM. Jayron32.talk.contribs 00:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.