User talk:Rebel shadow/Archive 1

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Loni Smith, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Coolv(Talk • Contribs) 22:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:River Ridge Front.JPG

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:River Ridge Front.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:River Ridge Front.JPG is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:River Ridge Front.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done

I just changed the name of the article for Pope John Paul II High School to Pope John Paul II High School (Boca Raton, Florida), as per your suggestion. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:34, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:LowresRRcrest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LowresRRcrest.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of KO-AM TV

A tag has been placed on KO-AM TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tim Song (talk) 06:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Washington Signature Stacked.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Washington Signature Stacked.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 07:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in you User Space

Hey there Rebel shadow, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Rebel shadow/Sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 22:37, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LowresRRcrest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LowresRRcrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kent Phoenix Academy

I got a question. On this edit you made from last year, you said that the Kent Phoenix Academy was established in 1996. I'm pretty sure that's not true because the Kent Phoenix Academy used to be Sequoia Junior High until the 2006-07 school year and then next year it was the Kent Phoenix Academy, was there another Kent Phoenix Academy because if there wasn't, should we say it was established in 2007? – Michael (talk) 23:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WIAA 2010 - 2011 alignments

Thanks for updating the WIAA navboxes and the WIAA article (the WIAA webpages don't seem to have the 2010-2011 assignments up yet, but I'm taking your word for it). I replaced the navbox template on the articles of affected schools in District 3, and I was wondering if we should also update the district 3 list on this page? (as well as anything else that might be affected) 71.231.76.242 (talk) 04:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, probably best to wait on the others until they're clearly official. I'll update any old links on school pages we know for sure whenever I get a chance. Cheers! 71.231.76.242 (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PR18 & Shinkenger

There has not been and there will not be a reliable source that says the new PR show will be based off of Shinkenger. Your addition of the title "Shinkenger" to the massive table you introduced at List of Power Rangers episodes is entirely wrong and should have never been done. The only time you can say Shinkenger and this new season are related is when the name "Shinkenger" appears in the credits of the new show.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note; do you have any suggestions to cite the entries in the "Related Super Sentai series" column of the table? Rebel shadow (talk) 02:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

How come your sig doesn't link anywhere on my user talk?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 09:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I actually don't know why- Rebel shadow 09:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

It's not linking here either. Go to your preferences and uncheck the "Treat this link as wiki markup" box.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:00, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:University Signature Stacked.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University Signature Stacked.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Crystal Cathedral Ministries

A tag has been placed on Crystal Cathedral Ministries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A10/G12: Copy-paste of Crystal Cathedral; no prejudice against re-creation as a redirect until a proper WP:RM discussion can take place

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Cathedral

Hi, I noticed you are an established editor who has recently been involved with editing Crystal Cathedral. There is currently a discussion going on on Talk:Crystal Cathedral regarding the wording on the article and would like another opinion on the matter, if you can. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Campus of the University of Washington, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terry Hall and University District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Roderick Vonhögen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Seattle Public Schools, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ballard High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Manila.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Lewis/McChord

It looks like you're doing a cut-paste move, which loses the attribution trail for the cut/pasted content. Since the target page has a short history, it would be more appropriate to do a history merge there if there is consensus for the merge in the first place. I'd suggest starting a discussion at WP:RM. Acroterion (talk) 03:51, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Or the relevant talkpage, as you've done. Cheers, Acroterion (talk) 04:01, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Walt Disney Studios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disney

Sadly, I've had to revert your edits. The pages you created at List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films (2007−present) and List of Walt Disney Feature Animation films (1986-2005) were just WP:CONTENTFORKS from List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films. Also, you moved List of sources for Disney theatrical animated features and overwrote it with one of the above, without incorporating the information elsewhere. I agree that List of sources for Disney theatrical animated features may be redundant if you properly incorporate the information to List of Walt Disney Animation Studios films and redirect there, but I don't think that this was really the way to go about things. --Rob Sinden (talk) 09:35, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, hopefully the Disney film articles will work themselves out Rebel shadow 03:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

When and how to say "this school district is in controversy"

Hi, Rebel!

I took a look at this edit. I've had to revert it again. See, you need a source which says explicitly "This school district is known for controversy" and even then, does it belong in the lead? No matter how many times media refer to this incident, you need an explicit statement in order to put those words in.

I will show you North Forest Independent School District. The newspapers said explicitly that the district had been in trouble since the late 1980s, and I crafted the citations and the article accordingly. Considering Wikipedia:Undue concerns, most substantial sources about North Forest are about the controversies, so it is okay to have the article structured as it is.

Also you want to avoid recentism. An incident may get controversy around when it happens, but will people refer to it years later?

WhisperToMe (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With the intro what I would do is try to summarize the entire article, and apportion weight accordingly. It may be good to gather the literature about Seattle Public Schools: the good, bad, and ugly. Books, journal articles, and news sources are fair game. Then decide how much of the article to apportion to each aspect (history, governance, list of schools, academic performance, student and staff demographics, finances, etc. - the best articles don't have "controversy" sections but instead distribute issues with controversy throughout the article). With subjects that are larger, it becomes harder to apportion weight. There had been issues with undue weight in, for example, Hugo Chavez.

If you know people from the Seattle area, do you know if they speak Oromo, Lao, and/or Tigrinya? There are not yet versions of the Seattle Public Schools article in those language editions of Wikipedia, and all three are spoken in the Seattle area. If you have friends from Ethopia and/or Eritrea there is a good chance they may know Oromo and/or Tigrinya.

WhisperToMe (talk) 20:33, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also about the molestation at Broadview-Thomson Elementary: Did central district officials know about it? Did this indicate a potential wider problem or controversy within the district? If not, it may be undue weight about should be removed. If the issue was local to the school, the content can be moved to "List of Seattle Public Schools" and the material can go in the school's entry. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Disney film ratings

I see what you mean, but I could make it so the other films on the page will have the statistics at a future date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adam the silly (talk • contribs) 22:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]