User talk:RebeccaMc81

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, SCAPCommittee, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

-- The Anome (talk) 13:13, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RebeccaMc81 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

RebeccaMc81 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My apologies, I didn't realise that an account couldn't be a group account. I would like to change the username to RebeccaMc81 so that the page I contributed is still reviewed and considered. The content is for information purposes only and is not intended as a promotion. It is simply to give the history of the award to date for anyone looking for information regarding the award. Much like the Miles Franklin and other awards on Wikipedia. I am not being paid to write it SCAPCommittee (talk) 07:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I've changed your username from SCAPCommittee; since this is only a username block, I will remove it. However, please read about conflict of interest before you edit further. Please also read about independent reliable sources; Wikipedia articles are only based on independent sources, as we aren't interested in what an organization wants to say about their awards; merely telling about something is considered promotional here. 331dot (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rename

not done. Please replace "new user name" with your choice of a new username. the new user name you want me to change to. Dlohcierekim (talk) 09:41, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi RebeccaMc81! You created a thread called Notability at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RebeccaMc81! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need in-depth coverage in multiple sources and I'm just not see this here yet. Probably a case of "too soon"

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie

Hello, RebeccaMc81. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie

Hello, RebeccaMc81. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rosanne Fitzgibbon Editorial Award – the Rosie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]