User talk:Rebecca.neilson

Orphaned non-free image File:Eiflteal box.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eiflteal box.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:08, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, Rebecca.neilson. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Electronic Information for Libraries, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

You need not declare your conflict of interest, but we recommend it.
Do not edit articles about yourself, your organization, or your competitors. Do not edit related articles. (Exceptions.)
Post suggestions and sources on the article's talk page, or create a draft in your user space.
Your role is to summarize, inform and reference — not to promote, sell, or whitewash.
If writing a draft, write without bias, as if you don't work for the company or personally know the subject.
Have us review your draft.
Work with us and we'll work with you.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 06:51, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest

Yes, I previously worked for EIFL and had uploaded text and logo on Wikipedia. I must say that I added information without reading much about Wikipedia's information on conflict of interest and understanding the importance of using a neutral tone. Apologies. I have seen that people have modified to indicate more neutrality and I would like to thank them for that.

I am now working for EAAP, based in Rome, Italy and I would like to state that there is another conflict of interest as I will try to update the page. I will however first post on talk of the page and let others help me to make sure I am referencing 3rd-party sources AND the tone is neutral.

Orphaned non-free image File:Whiteonteal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whiteonteal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]