User talk:RebaFan1996

Welcome

Hello, RebaFan1996, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Banjeboi 11:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Lordco

A tag has been placed on Lordco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 04:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Lordco

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Lordco meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lordco. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that removal of articles for deletion notifications from the body of an article is considered vandalism. If you have any assertions with respect to the potential retention of this article, the most useful place to make them would be on the page linked from the notification box which I've replaced on the above-captioned article. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:12, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States

Please don't make major changes like that without a large consensus to do so. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Lordco

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lordco, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.lordco.com/aboutus/page1/. As a copyright violation, Lordco appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lordco has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lordco and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lordco with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lordco.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. -- Banjeboi 11:23, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoshiarpur, Punjab

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hoshiarpur, Punjab, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Hoshiarpur. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:33, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Jalandhar a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Khalfani Khaldun 03:48, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop copying and pasting article content from one to another. This is a proper process for moving pages (see above) so that page history and discussions are not lost. If you continue to do this, I will consider your actions vandalism and have you blocked. Khalfani Khaldun 04:09, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About moving pages

While I doubt your page moves were especially problematic, it is highly suggested that before possibly controversial moves of pages you discuss it on the respected page's talk page. For example, I can find no consensus to move for Ludhiana, Jalandhar, and Hoshiarpur, or even a discussion about those moves. It should be noted that there is no official policy or guideline for places in India, so any move should be considered potentially controversial. Thanks for understanding! By the way, if you have any questions feel free to reply here and I'll notice and reply; if I can't help you I'll send someone bye who can. =) Khalfani Khaldun 05:42, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashley Alison Arm.jpg

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ashley Alison Arm.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

West Kelowna

Saw your name change but, er, as it has turned out and consensus has arrived at, and not that I like it, but when a Canadian city/town/etc has a unique name the guideline is that the comma-province is dropped. Vancouver, Toronto, Penticton.....and Kelowna. Now, it hasn't been applied "down the line" but of late it's ben extended to municipalities e.g. Maple Ridge (though there are other settlements named Maple Ridge, that's teh alrgest one, is why). I'm pretty sure the consensus-mongers on this will interpret this as not needing the comma-province, esp. since Kelowna doesn't have it....I'm pretty adamant on its use for tiny places, but there have been arguments agaisnt that also, e.g. Ucluelet or Shalalth or even Bralorne (i.e. a non-aboriginal name). There are other cases where it's not suitable to have the commoa-province "postal adres", such as pre-colonization placenames such as Opitsaht. That's not the logic that will be invoked here, even though the "Kelowna" part of the name is aboriginal; it's because there's no other place by this name that there's no need for disambiguation.....Skookum1 (talk) 01:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to Skookum1 (and I mean that Skookum!), article titles on Wikipedia do not participate in the articles. That means that the title is not used to explain the subject, it only uniquely identifies the subject. The recommended style for article naming is to use the simplest possible title. Since no other simple "West Kelowna" exists in the universe, the simple name is indicated. The new search function ensures that casual visitors will see first the correct article to click.

RebaFan, it looks like you may be move-warring with CKatz. Please read WP:BRD and bring your concerns to an appropriate talk page. Making second reverts helps no-one. Franamax (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Reba, if you have an issue with naming, please take it up at the appropriate place. You have now also unilaterally moved Moncton, two and one-half years after the page was successfully moved to that location, and again without any discussion. I also see several mentions above regarding improper cut-and-paste moves to other articles, suggesting a pattern. You should be aware that such behaviour can be considered disruptive if it continues. --Ckatz^chat _spy 02:09, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, yes. Reba, I don't want to beat up on you (none of us do) - but watch out with cut-and-paste where you don't give proper attribution for where you are getting the words from. That crosses a whole lot of boundaries...

There are lots of people willing to help you get comfortable here, I'm one of them. Let me know if you have questions. You can also ask to be adopted, which just means you can have someone more experienced to ask questions of, and there's lots of help desks and a pile of friendly people who will help if you ask them. Let's talk over what you're trying to accomplish, it can probably be done! Franamax (talk) 02:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the actual naming rules for Canadian city articles at WP:CANSTYLE if you need to, but a basic summary is as follows:

If a name is unique (e.g. Iqaluit, West Kelowna, Rouyn-Noranda), or the city is unquestionably the most prominent and primary use of its name (e.g. Toronto, Montreal, Moncton), then the article goes at "City".
If there's a valid and cogent reason why the article can't be at "City", then — and only then — it goes at "City, Province".

In a nutshell, we have the exact same naming convention as almost every country in the world. The US convention, requiring an invariable "City, State" in nearly all cases, is an outlier rather than the norm — and the Canadian contingent decided a long time ago that we want to follow the international norm, not the USian weirdness. Hope that helps a bit. Bearcat (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The only reason I moved West Kelowna was that no one discussed it and I felt that unfair so I moved it back. RebaFan1996 (talk) 03:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Springfield's State, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Laaa200 (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Demographics of Abbotsford, British Columbia

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Demographics of Abbotsford, British Columbia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Grossly inappropriate breakout of small section of article on small city.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 01:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re neighbourhoods thing

I agree with the overall thrust you're undertaking about neighbourhoods...I actually changed Heffley Creek, British Columbia to Heffley Creek, Kamloops, since it's now in city limits, but then again i see your observation/exemption for Westbank. But if Westbank, then also Clayburn and Kinnaird should have been left as-is; haven't noticed any change to Rosedale, Aldergrove or Cloverdale, but those are most commonly known in the comma-province format, as also with other local-identity-locations within Fraser Valley municpalities, e.g. Port Hammond, Whonoock, Agassiz, Sardis, Yarrow...but then so was Point Grey, and it was a separate municipality....anyway the ones I'd be concerned about are those that straddle borders, the ones I'm thinking of being Ruskin, Hatzic and maybe Burquitlam; those should be left as comma-province though maybe in Hatzic's case Hatzic Island and Hatzic Prairie are distinct enough as articles (technically landform articles but both also communities, though distinguishing Durieu from Hatzic Prairie is a subtle exercise mostly in terms of who goes/went to which school...Ruskin is commonly perceived to be in Maple Ridge, but the reality is half of it's in Mission (I know, I'm from Ruskin Dam, or was). Burquitlam maybe is more clearly Coquitlam, as the area north of Lougheed Mall and west of North Road is theoretically in it but is usually identified as North Burnaby (or part thereof, that is); East Burnaby is down by the New West border....Cariboo Hill is also both in New West and in Burnaby, and so on.....no biggie, just some cautionary notes on particular places....Skookum1 (talk) 21:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand how you feel but the reason I left Westbank and not Clayburn was because before I joined wikipedia I never knew about Clayburn all I thought it was just a road in Abbotsford like many people I know. I just thought since it is not that well known in the rest of the province I changed it. Plus with Westbank before it was incorporated into West Kelowna many people outside it called the whole area Westbank and Westbank is a real important place in West Kelowna because it's the oldest and it's the their downtown. RebaFan1996 (talk) 03:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, well same as with Yarrow, which you just did comma-Chilliwack on; it's like Rosedale or Sardis, a distinct place in its own right (vs Greendale which is tiny). Clayburn was historically important, in fact it was larger than the Village of Abbotsford in its heyday; similarly Matsqui, British Columbia should be left as-is, I don't think Sumas, British Columbia has been written yet (the old municipality of Sumas is what's being referred to, not Upper Sumas which is the same as Kilgard, or rather is the IR part of Kilgard). There's no Rutland, British Columbia article yet, but since that was its own municipality before amalgamation it should probably not be Rutland, Kelowna (which just looks odd). Similarly Flood, British Columbia should not become Flood, Hope. Remember that when making/correcting disambiguations the point is to distinguish from other similarly-named articles, so Silverdale, British Columbia is more than adequate (see the Silverdale disambiguation apge) as comma-province is all that's needed to distinguish it from, for example Silverdale, Washington. Similarly Ferndale, British Columbia doesn't need to be Ferndale, Mission; the comma-province is more than enough to distinguish it from Ferndale, Washington and other Ferndales.). This subject is probably worth enlisting comment from the Communities subproject of WP:Canada and maybe there's more on it in WP:CANSTYLE.Skookum1 (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! did I do Yarrow sorry I guess I wasn't thinking and If you want just change those places back and next time when you reply please don't give me a long list of examples thanks! RebaFan1996 (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]