User talk:Rearm21

Rearm21, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rearm21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Rearm21, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --David Biddulph (talk) 08:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

A few comments. First, your article needs to satisfy Wikipedia:Notability (people) by using reliable sources, see WP:RS. Secondly, we would never use words like "illustrious" the way you do. And third, normally any awards we mention need to have their own articles first, and those have to meet WP:Notable. Sorry, I won't have more time to discuss this with you I'm afraid. Doug Weller talk 10:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your conduct has been reported at the Administrators' Noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. —GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 00:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

This account has been blocked temporarily from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

You have been blocked for being suspected of abusing multiple accounts. Please confirm if you were editing as 202.90.136.142 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and also confirm your relationship with the account Miracle223. If you wish to make changes to Elmer Jamias article any further, please confirm that you will follow the rules that have been explicitly explained to you for the past three weeks, and instead of editing the article directly, you will adhere to propose changes through {{request edit}}. Alex Shih ^Talk 03:18, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rearm21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hi,I am Rodrigo Condaya III and I was instructed by Police Director Elmer Jamias, currently the Deputy Director of Directorate of Information and Communication Technology Management, Philippine National Police to update the Wikipedia article about him. This is my first time to do it so I am still learning the processes. In this regard, I am respectfully requesting for the immediate unblocking of this account so I can meet the short deadline he gave me. Thank you very much!

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your abuse of multiple accounts, nor your violations of WP:COI and WP:PAID. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.