User talk:Reaper X/Archive 3

Nice work...

thanks - well spotted. Merbabu 04:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Manning-Fabian.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manning-Fabian.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 19:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Russell-Todd.jpg

I have tagged Image:Russell-Todd.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 19:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sympathy for the Devil

Would you mind giving this song a rating? Thanks in advance. Stan weller 00:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(WikiProject Rock music) I'd welcome your comments

Hi Reaper! I recently joined your project, and am a little bit dissatisfied after seeing how it fares compared to other projects like WikiProject Alternative music. I'd love to see the project flourish, though. To address my concerns and eventually give the project some inertia, I've started a discussion at the Project talk page. Would love to hear your thoughts! Best wishes, Johnnyw talk 13:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:April_Wine_-_The_Whole_World's_Goin'_Crazy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:April_Wine_-_The_Whole_World's_Goin'_Crazy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:April_Wine_-_Roughly_Speaking.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:April_Wine_-_Roughly_Speaking.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:16, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:April_Wine_-_Forever_For_Now.jpg

I have tagged Image:April_Wine_-_Forever_For_Now.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:27, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:April_Wine_-_Stand_Back.jpg

I have tagged Image:April_Wine_-_Stand_Back.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:April_Wine_-_Electric_Jewels.jpg

I have tagged Image:April_Wine_-_Electric_Jewels.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:April_Wine_-_On_Record.jpg

I have tagged Image:April_Wine_-_On_Record.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:29, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:April_Wine_-_April_Wine.jpg

I have tagged Image:April_Wine_-_April_Wine.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Bigr Tex 23:30, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cobain and Novoselic

I've skimmed the book briefly, but it isn't entirely clear. Azerrad says Kurt first noticed Krist in high school; Krist graduated in 1983. Sometime after that they officially met. Kurt and Krist are implied to have started playing together in 1986. WesleyDodds 07:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Talent

User:CloudNine and User:LuciferMorgan are good people to ask for feedback regarding band pages. LuciferMorgan seems to be pretty busy right now, though. WesleyDodds 09:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Matthew Good

Sorry. I read it and didn't have time to respond, then blanked the next time I logged in.

NONE of his demos should have Wikipedia articles. They all fail notability guidelines. We can't even justify fair use for the cover art because we can't offer any "critical commentary" as required by Wikipedia guidelines. No publication has ever discussed them - we can't cite any commentary on them. (At the very least, all of the demo articles need to be merged into one article.)

But, specifically - why exclude And in Closing? It's not just Matt asking it not be included - we know nothing about the Rodchester Kings. Nothing. Was it his band? Was it someone else's band, and he was just providing vocals? The only information we have about the band comes from the History Teacher liner notes, which offer no details. (The demo itself might offer some details, but the liner notes aren't available anywhere.) Matt's involvement doesn't give the band enough notability for its own article, and the same applies to the demo (plus the problems mentioned above).

So now we're down to listing it in Matt's discography. The big question: is it actually a release? Do we know that it was actually available publicly, or just something that was made to get shows? If we can't prove that it's a release, we shouldn't include it in his discography.

The only reason that tape and his demos are listed are because we know they exist. Need a precedent for not including them? Eddie Vedder. Vedder was involved with several demos while living in San Diego (most notably with Bad Radio), yet the first release in his Discography is Temple of the Dog.

Last of the Ghetto Astronauts is Good's first actual release. The discography should start there. (However, that doesn't mean we can't mention the demos in the article text.) -- ChrisB 18:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As a pick up from this, my apologies if it has already been mentioned, but the article in question has practically no references or sources... - Just thought I'd mention it if it hasn't been already. Scarian ^Talk 12:01, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street Fighting Man

Would it be possible to get the article for "Street Fighting Man" re-assessed by you. I re-wrote it and it can't be stub any longer. Stan weller 23:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U2 Wikiproject

Hello, I am a member of the U2 Wikiproject and am currently coordinating a Collaboration of the Month/Fortnight. I was directed by LaraLove to come to one of you about how to set it up. Could you help? Thanks so much, Neranei ^T/C 17:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Street Fighting Man status

How's the article look to you? Good Article? Stan weller 23:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My talk page

Leave it alone. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.11.220.224 (talk • contribs) 06:47, August 11 2007 (UTC).

Type "demo" on Template:Infobox Album/doc/type

Thanks, I was going to get around to that, I just got caught up in cleaning up various template documentation. :-) --PEJL 03:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're working on Category:Non-standard album infoboxes, in case you're not already aware of this, there is at least one other type that is supported but is undocumented: Double album. I was planning to add that to Template:Infobox Album/doc/type once I figure out how to fix some formatting issues with that template. --PEJL 04:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Main page request

I just read your suggestion that Canada be the featured article on Canada Day 2008. Great idea. Did you make the request? If so, what was the result? If not, do you still wish to pursue it? We could raise it again on Talk:Canada and also at WikiProject Canada. Let me know your views. I'm putting a response on Talk:Canada now. Sunray 20:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey hrelp me with my page plz

my page is on canada plz help

Soku Kitty 16:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Katzman

Thank you for your comments. No offense taken. Where can I find a "free image"? Bearian 23:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Orig Crisis 300RGB.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orig Crisis 300RGB.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i did

Yeah i did but this guy keeps trying to delete a page about player for a Gaelic football team could you check it and if you think its good enough to be a page leave a comment on my talk pagePoint93 16:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a while back you sent me a message saying did you edit your user page without signing in and i didnt pays much remarks but i checkit there and i did,is that meant to be a joke how do you reply to a message because it is annoying having to go to peoples pages and click on disscussion etc.Point93 17:13, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

The type of citation method you use is irrelevant as long as you are consistent with its usage throughout the article and list the appropriate information (ie. Author, title, date, date accessed, etc.). In short, you aren't obligated to use the "cite" templates whatsoever. It's just a handy tool, but only if you've got the hang of it (I still have problems using it myself). WesleyDodds 05:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Listen

The reason I reverted the bot's addition of interwiki links is because interwikis, a part of the 'documentation', belong at Template:Listen/doc and not Template:Listen. In any case, the bot had failed to use the <noinclude></noinclude> and as a result the template's interwikis were appearing on every article in which the template:Listen is transcluded.- Gilliam 19:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wipers_promo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wipers_promo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 10:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and notice of poll regarding 'dominion' in Canada introduction

Hi there! I noticed you were involved in recent discussions regarding the above notion. Well, a poll has been initiated regarding this. Please weigh in. Thanks! Quizimodo 13:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there; care to weigh in? If so or not, thanks for your consideration. Quizimodo 15:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for weighing in -- I appreciate it. As well, would you be able to comment and indicate support/opposition to the above poll specifically? I would encourage you to read it fully beforehand. Thanks! Quizimodo 18:40, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there -- thanks for commenting. However, I just wanted to clarify one thing: this entire (and lengthy) poll/discussion concerns the current reference in the 4th sentence of 2nd paragraph: "....In 1867, with the union of three British North American colonies through Confederation, Canada became a federal dominion...." Some believe this is necessary to clarify the change in governance/structure brought about by Confederation in 1867 (Province of Canada before, federal dominion after). AFAIK, there is no proposal currently (nor would I support any) to change the first sentence of the article: "Canada is a country ..." I hope this helps, and I hope you'll refactor your assertions/comments on the talk page appropriately. Thanks for your efforts! Quizimodo 11:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. The second poll recently (where you retained your vote 'Support 1') was initiated after an earlier poll, which was started on a confusing and faulty premise. Anyhow, thanks again! Quizimodo 19:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh

Youre propley right. Its just I was kinda pissed that I wasent allowed to do the report on them... I told him today that its no reason to stop me from doing the report. We argued and I was almost sent to the office. But hey, screw em. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.23.119.35 (talk) 19:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wipers Box Set

Just a friendly heads up. I declined your request to speedy Wipers Box Set, because another user (NCase) has also made a substantial edit to the article. Is there some reason why this article needs to get deleted that I'm missing here? It looks like it's coming along nicely. If there's some other admin task you were trying to acheive with the article by getting it deleted, let me know and I'll be glad to help. --Fabrictramp 13:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, I was just deleting a whole slew of Wipers album pages I created a while back when I was a new Wikipedian and never made them into anything. I didn't see that the box set article had been contributed to by NCase, so it's my bad. Cheers. -- Reaper X 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: High Culture

Thank you! --PEJL 05:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remix album

All Music Guide was inconclusive, but the Billboard.com article cited in the article says the title is in fact Y34RZ3R0R3MIX3D. Technically there's nothing stylized about it (like the backward "R" in Korn), so for now that does seem like the official title. WesleyDodds 22:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orthography RfC

Would you be interested in starting a community-wide RfC regarding thoughts on guidelines (or lack thereof and how to address these issues) on orthography and naming conventions? Girolamo Savonarola 03:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers - Best of The Wipers and Greg Sage.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - Best of The Wipers and Greg Sage.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers - Better Off Dead.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - Better Off Dead.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers - Follow Blind.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - Follow Blind.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers - Power in One.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - Power in One.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers - The Circle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers - The Circle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wipers Rarities.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wipers Rarities.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography

I have reverted your changes because bot is not working, so after your edits today requests for comment have been deleted. If my revert is mistake sorry ...Rjecina 21:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Year Zero Remixed Page

I didn't cite the source because linking to warez is prohibited. You can find this out for yourself by searching for "Year Zero Remixed" on thepiratebay. I request that you update the page with this fact in mind. 67.190.241.7 21:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NIN WikiProject

I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed Nine Inch Nails WikiProject. There's alot of NIN-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this project can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help me get this project of the ground and a few Nine Inch Nails pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! Drewcifer 10:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tireless Contributions

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For fixing the mistakes made by SoxBot. Congratulations! And thank you! Soxred93 has a boring sig 01:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feeding the trolls?

I was not feeding the trolls in any way. That IP is not trolling! Please don't remove people's talk page comments without a legit reason. An IP user such as that one will more than likely not check out the archives, so I said it in a nutshell. Replying with "!!!" is more like feeding the trolls than directing the user to a useful page.. thanks. Jack?! 23:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously Reaper - removing that comment wasn't cool. I don't think he was feeding but even if he was, you should not be taking the liberties of modifying nor removing others' comments. Article discussion pages should really only be modified in cases of violating BLP or obvious vandalism. Even heated and insane discussion are rarely modified as many users believe talk should be preserved no matter what is said. Also, on a personal level, if someone removed my comment, I think I might be a bit offended because it's not like reverting another's edits, it's like telling someone what they said doesn't matter and does not need to be viewed. the_undertow ^talk 23:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, undertow. I did get rather offended, and I hope Reaper can see he made a mistake. Jack?! 23:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I know what you mean about edits reflecting your mood. I've hit 'undo' when I really could have taken the time to explain what I'm doing or actually fix the good faith edit myself. See ya around. the_undertow ^talk 21:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]