User talk:Reaper Eternal/Election thoughts 2013

Floquenbeam is a "he". Legoktm (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richwales and civility

Hi. I would welcome an opportunity to explore my views on civility with you in more detail. I believe my views on the subject are more involved than you might have concluded so far. I believe one important aspect to the overall issue — something people may not have appreciated as much last year as they may now — is the impact that uncivil actions could be having on our efforts to attract and retain editors. If you would like to pose some civility-related questions on my candidacy question page, I'll do my best to answer them. If you would prefer to talk about the matter here, on your talk page, that would be OK too. Or if you feel you already understand enough about how I think on this subject and don't really want to delve into it with me any more deeply, that's certainly your choice, and I'll respect it even if I wished you had chosen differently. Thanks. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 05:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that Heimstern has asked me a question about civility, which I will start working on an answer to shortly. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 01:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I did answer Heimstern's question to me about civility. — Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 22:41, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw and understand that you won't cause serious problems, but I am still leery. So my vote is almost certainly going to be a neutral. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AGK

Kiefer Wolfowitz's guide recommended your guide and I find I agree with most of his points. He opposed User:AGK and I dislike AGK's voting on the Tea Party debacle. Beyond what you've already stated, why would you disagree with Wolfowitz and support AGK? Chris Troutman (talk) 08:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]