User talk:Realkyhick/Archive Jun 2007

Hey, I guess you really are a HICK. Not trying to be offensive, but I cant help but notice you have a bit of a power trip thing going on. First, it might HELP you to understand there is a comedian named Dave Cook who started a craze. The article was going into explaining it, and why it is a cultural phenominon. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dane_cook Now, the article i was working on before you decided to be a nazi duche is considered LEGIT. Of course we cant expect a hick to understand that right? Do yourself a favor champ, do some research before thinking you know whats nonsense and what is not. Google is a good place to start. You should feel humbled. Perhaps a college education might do you good as well.

Hollywood Undead

I looked at the deleted versions of the article, and none of them particularly assert notability -- certainly not to the degree now laid out on the talk page. Even that page, however, is kinda iffy regarding notability. All the sources essentially say the same thing: that the band was popular on MySpace, is now signed to the MySpace record imprint of Interscope Records (no mention of this on the Interscope page), and has an album coming out in June. I think I will recommend to the poster that she ask for a deletion review. NawlinWiki 03:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

A deletion review might be appropriate. This article has been re-created about seven times now.[1]. The basic problem is that they don't have two CDs on a major label, or a national tour, or an article in a major publication. They have one song on a compilation CD from "Myspace Records", two self-published CDs in GraceNote, and minor mentions in articles about Myspace. So they don't meet WP:BAND. But they have a really loud Myspace PR operation. Supposedly they're going to have a CD out Real Soon Now [2], so I'd suggest postponing any action until that happens. They already have a mention in the Myspace Records article. --John Nagle 04:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Reply to your comment on my talk page

Thank you for your kind attitude; I really appreciate it :) It's nice to see some respectful Wikipedians for once.

In replying to your comment, I'm just curious, but which policy states that I cannot put a CSD tag on an article that has the {{underconstruction}} tag? I'm not trying to refute your claims or anything, but I just want to know for future reference. SuperDT 19:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Notability of Tribal Wars

I'm not the creator of the original article, I merely completed a redirect that someone left hanging on the old page. Please inform the correct person who first created the page rather then me. Thank you. --Steven 03:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Unblock (again, please)

I just got a message for that text.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Realkyhick 21:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Why do i see that message ? Which edit do you mean ? 212.95.108.48 22:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

How can that happen ? 212.95.108.48 22:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Vandals must have a final warning before being blocked on User:Hutcho. using TW

May 2007

Thank you for making a report about User:Hutcho (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Evilclown93 23:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter - Issue 8

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 8	19 May 2007	About the Newsletter
Departments: Features: State updates Project news USRD members assist Canada project California Deletion debates Two debates at USRD Illinois Featured member A new GA Oklahoma From the editors Pennsylvania From the editors Washington
Archives  |  Newsroom   Shortcut : WP:USRD/NEWS

Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. —VshBot (t • c) 19:07, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Deletion reason on List of Samurai shodown animals

You had the following deletion reason: This is an indisicriminate list which can easily be incorporated in the main Samurai Shodown article. This is not a current speedy reason. I've nominated the article to AFD, and it can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Samurai shodown animals. Please make sure your speedy reasons match one of the speedy criteria, otherwise just post them at AFD. Cheers! —— Eagle101^{Need help?} 22:24, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

My stub "Legislative history of the tip credit".

Thanks very much for your comment/observation.  My purpose is just to hold a place for an ancillary article to my main article "Tip wage credit" that I've been developing on my Talk page, and have just today pasted as its intended Wikipedia namespace article.  My main article has a short section on the legislative history of the tip [wage] credit.  Whittaker's CRS monographs on the minimum wage and the tip wage credit are concise, authoritative, and definitive, as they are on other subjects of his on topics of Congressional interest.  What I intend my "legislative history" article to be is a summary of Whittaker's work on the subject.  My article will not be a verbatim copy of Whittaker's work, of course, but I cerainly will clearly identify him and the CRS report as the source of my article.  Thanks again.  K. Kellogg-Smith 00:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Please explain more fully

I took a look at User:Realkyhick, and saw it looked like you had applied Category:Wikipedians against notability to yourself.

I too think "notability" should be deprecated.

Yet you applied {{nn}}? Have you considered putting a sub-page somewhere in your user pages where you explain your views on notability more fully?

Cheers! Geo Swan 19:20, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Please explain more fully

I responded to the {{nn}} tag you applied to the Muhammad Jayid Hadi Al-Subai'i article.

Can I ask how much time and energy you spent on this article, before you applied the tag?

Can I ask you to explain your placement of the tag more fully?

Cheers! Geo Swan 18:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Which {{nn}} triggered my concern you asked? The one on Muhammad Jayid Hadi Al-Subai'i.

User talk:Geo Swan carrying around an inappropriate tags because one one of my correspondents wasn't careful when they discussed it with me. When I looked into it I had been carrying it around for more than six months. That is why I was careful when I asked about it. I thought it might be that kind of mistake.

Anyhow, if you are going to discuss your placement of {{nn}} on the Muhammad Jayid Hadi Al-Subai'i article, let's discuss it on Talk:Muhammad Jayid Hadi Al-Subai'i

If you decide you don't want to discuss that particular {{nn}}, I trust you won't have a problem with me putting a link to this discussion on Talk:Muhammad Jayid Hadi Al-Subai'i? Just in the interests of completeness.

Cheers!

I'd be interested in reading the treatise you mentioned. But it seems to have gone AWOL. -- Geo Swan 04:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

World War I

Just so you know, the article that I deleted and you recreated was at World War l with a lowercase L at the end, not World War I with a capital i at the end. The deleted version had no history except vandalism. Unless I'm mistaken ... maybe you can double check me. --Ed (Edgar181) 23:52, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey

Removed the tags, before it was just a stub template, so you can see where I came from there.--Whsitchy 22:06, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Jens Rydén

Hello, I removed the speedy tag you placed on this article. Ryden was a member of Naglfar (band), so he appears to have some prima facie notability. If you still feel this article should not be included in Wikipedia, there is still WP:AFD. Thanks! Johnleemk | Talk 16:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed Article "Let's Get Out of Here"

Looks like this one got snuffed this one right away, without even sitting on Death Row. I can't find it in "articles set for deletion", and even those articles haven't been taken off yet. Is the "Wikipedia Deletion Policy" taken seriously? Mandsford 19:26, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

(Response) I anticipated this, but it's not intended as a facetious article. (If I can get to the article again, I'll add the sources, which were from books and from imsdb.com, and I'll delete the M.L. Ford part); Coincidentally, I, too, am a real Kentucky hick, though I still live here. The prevalence of "let's get out of here" is noted not just in the Guinness "Film Facts & Feats" book (Patrick Robertson, 1985), but on commentaries that go with films, such as DVD-TV on AMC. Did I sit and watch all these movies myself? Of course not. I referred to the Internet Movie Script Database (imsdb.com).

The research is no less original than the numerous articles about a TV episode from some new TV series. And don't get me started about how every other article seems to feature a cultural reference to "The Simpsons". Geez Louise, it's like I can't read about polyurethane without a note that says, "Bart says the word 'polyurethane' in Episode 7 of the 10th season". Please, let this one grow and be added to. LGOOH is fun for movie buffs. Mandsford 17:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Lights.Action!

Hi, I saw you placed it for speedy deletion. Is the Skinnymag source at the bottom enough to verify its notability? If not then leave it as is and let the reviewing admin decide whether to delete it. Thanks you. -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 07:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)