User talk:Realjerick21

Realjerick21, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Realjerick21! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Realjerick21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22515 was submitted on Aug 31, 2018 11:55:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Realjerick21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Realjerick21". The reason given for Realjerick21's block is: "Bizarre pattern of disruptive and incompetent edits, including frivolous protection requests with fabricated accusations of disruption, inappropriate tagging of pages, frivolous deletion nominations, unexplained addition/modification/removal of content, failure to use sources, nonsense/test edits in mainspace, edit warring, appar...

Blocking administrator: Swarm (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Technical decline, as this is not an autoblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realjerick21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account was accidentally blocked. Realjerick21 (talk) 12:30, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The block by User:Swarm appears to be quite deliberate to me, and you will need to address the stated reasons for it if you wish to be unblocked. The block log reason says:

"Bizarre pattern of disruptive and incompetent edits, including frivolous protection requests with fabricated accusations of disruption, inappropriate tagging of pages, frivolous deletion nominations, unexplained addition/modification/removal of content, failure to use sources, nonsense/test edits in mainspace, edit warring, apparent promotional edits on behalf of an organization".

Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realjerick21 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is accidentally blocked and didn't edit yet. Realjerick21 (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As explained below, your claims of not having edited make no sense. If you are unable to communicate reasonably in English then you perhaps sholdn't be editing here. You've already made 3 non-compliant unblock requests - next time you do so you'll lose the ability to edit this page. And please explain your relationship with Gospel Broadcasting Corporation - do you have any conflict of interest? Max Semenik (talk) 07:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes you did edit, quite extensively, as anyone can see here. I suspect the problem is poor command of English? If so, you would probably be better at the Wikipedia in your native language. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. Realjerick21 (talk) 09:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you are consistently displaying no understanding whatsoever of anything anyone is saying to you or what you are supposed to do to request an unblock, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. I strongly recommend you stick to the Wikipedia in your native language (which I suspect, judging by your article edits, might be Tagalog?). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]