User talk:Readingwritingrithmatic

A page you started (Alvin Seale) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alvin Seale, Readingwritingrithmatic!

Wikipedia editor Z10987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

It's a good article, but remember that categories with less than 3 articles will be deleted!

To reply, leave a comment on Z10987's talk page.

Thanks- I am still learning how to use categories. I am finding them a bit complicated figuring out where to put the articles I write. I will try to add Alvin Seale to some already well-established categories. Readingwritingrithmatic (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

references

Just noticed that a reference was removed because it came from a commercial site, Amazon. but I believe that is a good place to learn what age reader this book is appropriate for, which is what I used Amazon to prove.

I also dont really understand why the additional links were removed. Isnt it good to have some links to get more information about the book or the author?Readingwritingrithmatic (talk) 12:31, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shlomo Ben-Haim, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anti-viral and Chief Scientist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Kevin Ellis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Kevin Ellis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kevin Ellis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:15, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Day of the Pelican for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Day of the Pelican is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Day of the Pelican until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alvin Seale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alvin Seale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvin Seale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Archeological Services Inc.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Archeological Services Inc.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:XLHealth Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XLHealth Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg

The file File:Logo of AMR Research Inc.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:08, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]