User talk:Rdusatko

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Reinhard Bonnke. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you.. Entheta 13:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:JerusalemOldCityGolgotha.jpg

Hello, thanks for uploading File:JerusalemOldCityGolgotha.jpg, but I have to ask: is that satellite photograph a Google-Maps screenshot? In that case, I'm afraid I'll have to delete it, as Google Maps are unfortunately copyrighted. If you want to create a truly self-made and free map, you could work on the basis of Openstreetmap. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. However, please do not add unsourced WP:Fringe items to Wikipedia. I reverted them. Please read WP:Fringe and WP:RS. History2007 (talk) 16:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:JerusalemOldCityGolgotha.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:JerusalemOldCityGolgotha.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:CleanPlacesForAshes.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golgotha and the Red Heifer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golgotha and the Red Heifer (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rdusatko, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer

Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Golgotha and the Red Heifer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Doug Weller (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:RedHeiferPriestSprinklingBlood.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RedHeiferPriestSprinklingBlood.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Golgotha

You seem determined over many years to use Wikipedia to publicise your own theory about the location of Golgotha. Please stop as this is a serious misuse of Wikipedia. There are multiple problems with what you are trying to do and you may be blocked from editing if you continue:

It’s a breach of WP:COI as your editing about yourself which is not allowed.
It’s original research which is not allowed. We only reflect material already published in reliable sources - for our definition of what counts as a reliable source please read WP:V and WP:RS.
It’s a fringe theory per WP:FRINGE and to include it is a breach of neutral point of view policy and, specifically, WP:UNDUE. We only give space to mainstream opinions: “Neutrality requires that mainspace articles and pages fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources.[3] Giving due weight and avoiding giving undue weight means articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects. Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all…”

DeCausa (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:RedheiferInThirdYear.jpg

The file File:RedheiferInThirdYear.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

low quality and unused

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]