User talk:Rdpaperclip

Siew Ooi

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Siew Ooi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. —Travis ^talk 15:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Siew Ooi

Siew Ooi, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Siew Ooi satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siew Ooi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Siew Ooi during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Travis ^talk 20:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. GreenJoe 04:19, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:O3_ph2.jpg

I have tagged Image:O3_ph2.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. Rette tast 23:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Anthony Chidiac

An article that you have been involved in editing, Anthony Chidiac, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Chidiac (2nd nomination). Thank you. -- Ben 19:58, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image and NDA?

Hi. Could I get you to comment on an image you put up? This link should take you to the discussion. No big deal probably. Thanks. -- Ben 23:56, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RD, can you delete/ok to delete this picture of the Tech Estate? Its because its dated, mainly. Perhaps once you see the work done later you can ask me and I may allow it to be re-added from a "Historic" point of view if you wanted to get Tracey to comment about it, but at the moment I'd prefer all traces/remnants to be off here. Thankyou. --Achidiac 01:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RD, can you report a 3RR by User:Sarah? I don't know how to do it, but I sent her the warning and did as the process dictates. Or, can you ask Admin Anthony to do it or something? She is completely ruining information on Internet Cafe and not participating in discussion - taking away cited material and linked references. She thinks she is above the law being an admin. Not very fair. --T3Smile 11:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two reverts in the last 24 hours is not a valid basis for a 3RR report - the relevant forum (WP:AN/3RR) will reject it out of hand. Orderinchaos 12:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account block and recent disputes

Please see User talk:Achidiac#Recent_disputes. I hope this explains what's up. I've written in detail.

I am of course immediately contactable by email if there is a need, and I will reply.

Best,

FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 17:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:O3 ph2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:O3 ph2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jreferee t/c 14:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jreferee, could you please hold off on deletion listing for now until I know what is going on with article and material. I have no way of asking you anywhere else as I am blocked. Thanking you in advance for your help in such. Most appreciated. --Rdpaperclip 04:00, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

chidiac outcome

Dear anyone, could somebody please enlighten me on chidiac case? I am in the dark about it all and need information as to outcome. Thanks! --Rdpaperclip 03:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rdpaperclip (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

cannot contact blocking admin - sent 2 emails already. This IP is a shared IP I use, so others in building/campus cannot edit/use wikipedia. Please at least unblock IP and please give me fair reason as to why I remain blocked. Thankyou and have a splendid day. RD

Decline reason:

It is unclear whether this editor intends for this, and not his other accounts, to be the account he will edit from. It is also unclear whether he has an ongoing lawsuit against Wikipedia; per WP:LEGAL, users who are in legal proceedings with Wikipedia should not edit until after the suit is concluded. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 04:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.