User talk:Rdfcvn

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rdfcvn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The username has been chosen as the desired name was not available. In case any govt. ID is required, please do advise. Thank You. Rdfcvn (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no block on this account. If you cannot edit, please tell the exact message you get when you attempt to edit. You successfully edited yesterday. 331dot (talk) 17:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ohh I see! I read that wrong. Thank you for your review 331dot and sorry that I wasted your time. Rdfcvn (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jpgordon, the recent draft you deleted citing to be an advertisement is not an advertisement, but is about a real living journalist from my land. So, would you be kind enough to honour the news references I cited there? Thank You. Rdfcvn (talk) 19:55, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rdfcvn,

If you want to communicate with someone, it's best to go to their user talk page. If you have questions about Wikipedi'a deletion policies, bring them to [[WP:TEAHOUSE}the Teahouse]], do not create orphaned talk pages because they will be deleted. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]