User talk:Rdeluca03

Hello, Rdeluca03. You have new messages at Justpassin's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Rdeluca03, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Friday (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fashionology LA

Hi.. this was deleted because it's not an encyclopedia article. It looks like.. I don't know, random graffiti? I can't even tell what it's trying to be about. Friday (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now I see what it's about, but it's blatant advertising. Friday (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fashionology LA

A tag has been placed on Fashionology LA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ~~ N (t/c) 20:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Fashionology LA, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:39, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Elizabeth wiatt

A tag has been placed on Elizabeth wiatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 20:56, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth wiatt

Please stop re-creating this page, it's already located at Elizabeth Wiatt proper capitalization and no matter how notable she may be, she doesn't need two pages. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 21:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, the redirect had been deleted as an implausible typo (huh?) and Rdeluca03 may not have realized the page had been moved, not deleted outright. ~~ N (t/c) 21:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The first time, maybe but s/he's re-created it several times, as well as another article that has been speedied three times today. The good faith assumption is wearing out. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 00:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Please read Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 00:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your article

The best way is to make sure the article is very well sourced. Also, keep in mind the conflict of interest issues. Take a look at WP:BIO if you want for some guidelines on biographies. Friday (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Tisch

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jamie Tisch, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Justpassin (talk) 20:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Jessica Lu.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jessica Lu.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Koch (actor).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 08:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Koch (actor) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Koch (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Koch (actor)

Hello Rdeluca03. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Alexander Koch (actor)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Koch (actor)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:03, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jessica Lu.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Jessica Lu.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FDMS 4 20:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]