User talk:Rcomm1

May 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Beethoven's 2nd (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

1. Subtitles, even if they are official (and there can be more than one set), are not reliable sources, because the subtitles often misspell character names (and whatnot) and/or misinterpret what characters say.

2. Do take this into account, as well. Referring to one user as a "fermented kangaroo" is even more wrong than your unsubstantiated edit. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:28, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DawgDeputy (talk) 01:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Beethoven's 2nd (film). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. bonadea contributions talk 09:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. You were told to stop (a) edit-warring, and (b) attacking other editors. So you promptly started doing both again. This is simply a waste of other, more productive, editor's time.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 18:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rcomm1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I was blocked, and will not break Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines again.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Final report

I just wanted to let you know that you had the right spelling for Mo's name. You just had the wrong source. DawgDeputy (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]