User talk:Rcliu31

Recent edits to Liu Chao-Han

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Liu Chao-Han, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Vítor (talk) 19:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Christoph Schreiner moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Christoph Schreiner. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 14:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for my newbie mistakes. I did not understand how to submit the Sandbox version I made since the Draft Title was not the name of the Subject (Christoph Schreiner). The entry is not meant to be promotional or serve as an advertisement. Schreiner is retiring in 2024, and I created this entry to mark the scientific advances made during Schreiner's career so that those interested in auditory neuroscience can understand the contributions. I have now tried to edit the text to read more factually and neutrally. Rcliu31 (talk) 01:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest?

Welcome to Wikipedia! May I ask what is your relation with Christoph Schreiner? Your only edits have been on his page, which is written in a promotional tone. Please note that Wikipedia requires users with a conflict of interest to publicly disclose it in their user page, and to send the pages they create through the articles for creation process. Please have a look at our conflict of interest guideline and let me know. All the best, Broc (talk) 14:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship with Schreiner is that I was a postdoc partly mentored by Schreiner nearly 20 years ago, but we have not worked together since I left. This entry is not paid for. Tone was intended to be similar to that for Michael Merzenich, who collaborated with Schreiner. I was not aware of the AfC process until now; I initially wrote in my Sandbox, but did not understand how to change the Draft Title when I tried to submit for review. As to why this is my only edits on Wikipedia, I became motivated to try to contribute because Schreiner is retiring in 2024, and I wanted to document his contributions to the field for those who want to learn about auditory neuroscience and its history - many who have been trained by Schreiner. Rcliu31 (talk) 01:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestion: submit the draft for review by pressing the "Submit the draft for review!" button on the page. An Article for Creationreviewer will check it and provide comment, or approve it and move it to mainspace. I strongly suggest disclosing your personal relation with the subject in your user page, perhaps using {{connected contributor}}, then go ahead and have fun editing! Broc (talk) 16:03, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Christoph Schreiner - last steps

Hello, I noted that the draft of your article on Dr. Christoph Schreiner has been waiting for publishing for quite some time. I am an Articles for Creation reviewer, and I believe that it is almost ready, but there are some things that need references for it to be published, mainly in his early and personal life. Particularly in the former; in the latter area, due to privacy concerns, even if a reference can be found regarding his personal life aspects such as children, details such as names of children should be omitted if they are not independently notable. Once you make these changes I or another reviewer will look at the article and make a decision. Recon rabbit 18:50, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christoph Schreiner (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OhHaiMark was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christoph Schreiner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OhHaiMark (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rcliu31! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OhHaiMark (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]