User talk:Rbuell
| This user is a student editor in UC_Berkeley/Grappling_with_Global_Poverty_(Spring_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rbuell, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Rbuell, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Economy of Kenya have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Diannaa, I have a few questions. The student took his work from this book by the World Bank, which releases its work through a compatible Creative Commons license. The content he used is on page 5 (page 47 on the PDF). It does cite the Human Rights Watch as a source, but not in a way that would suggest that the material was held under a more restrictive Creative Commons license, one that isn't compatible with Wikipedia. I do see where this material is covered in the HRW source on page 11 (13 on the PDF). Their writing is fairly close to what is in the World Bank source, enough to where under other situations this could be seen as close paraphrasing.
- I suppose my question here is this: is the content in the World Bank book usable since it so closely paraphrases the original source? It's held under a different license that does allow the student to post the content, but I don't know if it being so close to the source material would make this any different.
- With that said, Rbuell, I would recommend re-writing this into your own words since this is such a tricky situation. This looks like it will definitely be the easiest solution here. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- The document is here. That website's license as shown here is a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 US) license, which is not a compatible license. The WorldBank book shows "©2007 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank" so it looks to me like this particular World Bank document is not released under a compatible license. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- I will take into both your guy's comments into consideration and re-write this section. Thanks so so much (Rbuell (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC))
Thank you!
[edit]Hello Royce,
Thank you for the comments and feedback you gave me for my Wikipedia edits; they are very helpful. Thank you and I wish you all the best for your practice experience and your stay in Kenya.