User talk:Razorweiner

Edward Low's Homosexuality

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Edward Low, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on the format of the citations right now. It's hard to get it done though with people trying to revert edits and such while I'm in the middle of the project. Please be patient and give me time to post my work. Thank you. Razorweiner (talk) 15:49, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's now been reverted by at least 3 different editors - I would suggest that you get the references in order before adding it back. Dawn Bard (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll finish typing it all up and getting it added. Thank you so much for your advice and kindness!Razorweiner (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask the nature of your project? So far, your contributions have been to add uncited attributions of homosexuality to articles on Edward Low, Jenniphr Goodman, and, of all things, Rainbow Brite, as well as adding dubious/offensive "See alsos" to Buggery and Homosexuality. Most glaringly from your addition of Hell to the "See also" section of homosexuality, you seem to be grinding a very particular axe. Wikipedia is is not a soapbox, and all contributions should be verifiable, especially when they are about living people (e.g., Goodman). Please take a moment and consider whether or not your present course is the one you want to be on. --Dynaflow babble 16:06, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, the nature of my project is to provide factual information about Edward Low seeing as how I'm one of his last living relatives. I've taken diaries, personal accounts, and being a homosexual myself I am very proud of his efforts. I'm new around here, but I'm getting the hang of the HTML editing and stuff and doing fine. I'm sorry that my type of people offend you and things like homosexuality and buggery do as well. We are who we are and God loves us still the same. It's hard dealing with religious fundamentalist ideals and beliefs like yours. Well, something is wrong with my account and I'm trying to talk to the user Gogo Dodo and figure out why he doesn't like homosexuals either. Thanks for talking to me and being so kind. Razorweiner (talk) 16:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw your other post dynaflow. What is a sock? What is WP:Sock? Is it more HTML code?Razorweiner (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Dynaflow and Dawn Bard, I think I got it right this time. Thank you both for your help, it means a lot to me. Now, how do I get a hold of this Gogo Dodo person and talk to them? Razorweiner (talk) 16:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Click: WP:SOCK. Gogo Dodo probably not be reviewing his or her own block; another administrator will likely do so. --Dynaflow babble 16:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand now. My account wasn't blocked because I am a homosexual, it was blocked because my IP address is shared? How do I get a new one? Razorweiner (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Does Aranesp (talk · contribs) = you? --Dynaflow babble 16:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I just found what you wrote. What are you asking me? I don't understand? Isn't Aranesp a prescription medicine for high blood pressure? Why wouldn't the Gogo Dodo person understand and do my unblock? Is this how this works? Someone just comes a long and blocks you because of your IP address and doesn't tell you anything about it then disapears? What if the person who looks at the unblocks doesn't like my kind? This is very confusing. Razorweiner (talk) 17:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That nasty ohnoitsjamie user is following me around again and denied my unblock thingy. What should I do now Dynaflow? Your the only nice one who has even stopped and talked to me so far. Razorweiner (talk) 17:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dawn Bard and Dynaflow, thank you for all you've taught me on wikipedia and for being so friendly. I hate to say it but if I ever want any hope of getting my articles being published I need to get away from auburnpilots lap dog and pursue a different approach to good faith editing. I appreciate your friendship, kindness, civility, open invitations for my questions asked, and everything else. Before I go I'd like to read you this poem.

When I come to the end of the road, and the sun has set for me, I want no rites in a gloom filled room Why cry for a soul set free.... Miss me a little - but not too long And not with your head bowed low Remember the love that we once shared Miss me - but let me go... For this is a journey that we all must take and each must go alone, It's all a part of a greater plan a step on the road home. When you are lonely and sick of heart go to the friends we know... and bury your sorrow in doing good deeds Miss me - but let me go.

It certainly is beautiful. Well, I must be off. Good luck in all you do my friends and may the road rise to meet you. I know this is rough but please don't shed any tears for me. Shed your tears for those poor articles that mean something to us in life and for those users who are cut down before they can even prosper. Thank you, thank you, and thank you again. So long my friends. Razorweiner (talk) 17:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Formal Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razorweiner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Formal unblock request added. Please unblock me, I don't mean to share an IP address with anyone else.

Decline reason:

Obvious sockpuppetry. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ohnoitsjamie

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razorweiner (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The editor ohnoitsjamie has a personal vendetta against homosexual users. I would request any other admin besides she or her lover auburnpilot review this block. Thank you for being fair and unbiased to all other reviewing admin.

Decline reason:

All unblock requests that attack others are declined. Sandstein 18:20, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How did I get dragged into this? --auburnpilot talk 17:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

Goodbye all my friends. See you around I guess. Razorweiner (talk) 17:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]