User talk:Razeasheghi

Welcome!

Hello, Razeasheghi!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 06:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi sir, i wrote an article about Ali Tajdary, he is a singer and he is an actor and a sports hero, he deserves to be in wikipedia in two ways: 1: in terms of MMA, according to the wiki rules of every person in an organization he has won the highest title in the organization. he has won championship belts in two organizations(WJF & BUDO), (the belt is awarded to the highest fighter of any organization). he has also played the leading role in more than ten films and series and won two awards. has won an actor, but this article has returned to the (my draft ) from the (article) , i can ask you to review the article and if it is approved, we will return it to the main space,

he is a popular artist and athlete among iranians and is the only artist whose music concerts are for children with cancer and he does not receive any money and donates his concert income to cancerous childeren . this person deserves to have a page on wikipedia.

thank you sir.Razeasheghi (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://bakutime.com/the-concerts-of-ali-tajdary-a-famous-iranian-champion-and-artist-for-cancerous-children/ Razeasheghi (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hoseinkandovan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoseinkandovan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 06:54, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello, is anyone who revives ali tajdaris article considered a sock? i dont understand the reason for being blocked. please explain more because i have been blocked illogically for no reason.

do you block wikipedians instead of encouraging them?

Razeasheghi (talk) 09:24, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razeasheghi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, i hope the respected administrator who will handle my request will be fine, i am a wikipedian who wrote an article about ali tajdari, this article was deleted because it was written by other people and did not have complete sources, i due to the fact that the article was worth posting on wikipedia, i revived it and added appropriate links to it, i did not do anything wrong in this valuable platform to deserve to be blocked, please see my article and if i still deserve i am blocked. please let me know. i think my article should also be returned to the main space because it has no errors and is creatively and completely written. thank you, i will respect your decision.Razeasheghi (talk) 09:43, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for violating WP:SOCK but don't address this in your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:04, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razeasheghi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, i dont know why i was blocked, but i revived an article that had no valid sources when it was deleted, but now it has, the article was about ali tajdari, whose three fights in mma were not yet registered on the sherdog site. but it is currently registered and according to the mma athletes reputation rules, it is eligible to appear on wikipedia, please check my article and also my edits, if i am eligible to appear as a wikipedia writer, unblock me. thank you, i respect your every decision even if i am not allowed to attendRazeasheghi (talk) 00:19, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"hello, i dont know why i was blocked" ... See above and read WP:IDHT. I don't know why I should unblock you. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razeasheghi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello, i realized why i was blocked, but i didnt know that pressing to register an article would lead to a block, of course, i could not properly show the merit of that article to stay in wikipedia, and the administrators were absolutely right, but from there now that i have a solid document that the article is worth staying on wikipedia, please unblock me if possible so that i can prove my point according to wikipedias rules, i dont want to cause any harm, just because i worked on this article for two months, i wanted a i will add a valuable article to wikipedia, in any case, i realized my problem and i am also grateful to the administrators, and if you see fit, unblock me, the rules of the wiki and also the opinions of the administrators are respected.Razeasheghi (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced you understand the reason for the block. You are blocked for sock puppetry but don't discuss that here. 331dot (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Razeasheghi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not socks Hussain Kandwan and this can be tracked by IP tracking, but I copied Hussain's article when he created it and promoted it and published it on Wikipedia, Hussain's article was valid but he got it wrong, Hussain's mistake It had nothing to do with the topic of the article, but he did not observe politeness and decency and used different accounts to vote, I didn't do anything impolite and I didn't do any inappropriate discussion on Wikipedia and I didn't do any vandalism either, please check the cases And if you confirm my statements, remove me from the block or at least let me prove myself by making correct edits and helping to improve Iranian articles.I am a new wikipedian and I expect you, the moderators, to guide me and give me time so that I can work on Wikipedia to the best of my ability.Razeasheghi (talk) 13:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if you're not a sock puppet, that would make you a meat puppet, which is basically the same thing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.